Let's break the effects of implementing a parser into the game into some cases:
An @sshole sees your DPS after the first pull, reams you for not pulling your weight then vote kicks you. Harassment. Report. Move on. It would have been nice if they had acted human toward you, but it's the internet and there's no way that is going to happen 100% of the time no matter what. That's why harassment is reportable and it can be punished. Assume they are a dick all the time not just to you, don't take it personally, keep calm and carry on. For the record, people who are jerks are jerks already, parser or no. They just look at your gear instead. Therefore, this scenario is neutral: it neither improved or harmed the raiding meta. It's the same.
A decent fellow looks at his own numbers and realizes that they're less than the rest of the raid, or (ideally) he's comparing himself to other people his class for this fight. He doesn't say anything to anyone about it, but just looks up some ways to improve his rotation on the internet. Starts putting out better numbers. Everyone in the raid is happy, the quality of the meta improves by that much. Positive outcome
A helpful player notices that someone in their team is pulling low numbers. They casually offer to help said player, making suggestions about how they could improve. This other player accepts the advice with humility. Assuming it was good advice when they try it their numbers improve and they become a better player. Everyone in the raid benefits, the quality of the meta improves by that much. Positive outcome
A helpful player does the above, but the DPS in question gets butthurt and accuses player #1 of being mean and they demand that they can play their own way. Three options - Player 1 leaves, player 2 leaves, neither leave and they play the dungeon. Both option one and option two are less than ideal but they are already happening. Option three could end in clearing the dungeon or vote abandon. It has to be a seriously terrible dungeon run to make up for the 30 min lockout, and the vote abandon because you legitimately can't finish is disappointing and frustrating, but both situations are rare and are also already happening occasionally so how is it any different? Neutral outcome.
Therefore, all scenarios with a parser are either improved from what we have now, or neutral. Nothing is more toxic than it is already. The key here is that in order to get the benefits of the parser, we all need to try to be courteous and empathetic, as well as humble with thick-skins. If we have sensitive people or jerks the parser doesn't help us but, well, it really happens already, doesn't it? So it's not making it worse either.


Reply With Quote




