hunt hoggers

[Sanghelios]

Square could do a LOT against this. For example max health based on amount of players near the mob, so it lasts for a minute and not for a second after pull. This alone would help to let more people arrive even if it is a early pull. And thats just one example. Square did make the same mistake with hunts again, even if people told them loud and clear that the current system how hunts are working is shit. Thats what you get for your monthly sub.

I stopped with hunts a long time ago. Dont need to play such overall salty and poorly developed content.

[ServerCollaps]

Square could do a LOT against this. For example max health based on amount of players near the mob, so it lasts for a minute and not for a second after pull. This alone would help to let more people arrive even if it is a early pull. And thats just one example. Square did make the same mistake with hunts again, even if people told them loud and clear that the current system how hunts are working is shit. Thats what you get for your monthly sub.

dont do them if you dont like it, there are plenty of other options to get your rewards:

do your daylies/weekly
go void arc
go alex savage

[CyrilLucifer]

dont do them if you dont like it, there are plenty of other options to get your rewards:

do your daylies/weekly
go void arc
go alex savage

"If you don't like it, don't do it" does nothing to fix the problem for people who want to do hunts and don't have an entire party on friends on immediate standby, though. It doesn't even make an attempt to hide the symptom.

Hunts were designed with inclusiveness in mind, not for one group to control them like FFXI NMs circa 2005.

That being said, the problem is less with hunts themselves and more the playerbase in this case.

[Seryl199]

"If you don't like it, don't do it" does nothing to fix the problem for people who want to do hunts and don't have an entire party on friends on immediate standby, though. It doesn't even make an attempt to hide the symptom.

Hunts were designed with inclusiveness in mind, not for one group to control them like FFXI NMs circa 2005.

That being said, the problem is less with hunts themselves and more the playerbase in this case.

Hunts weren't designed to be inclusive. It was a player base decision to take content designed for, at most, one alliance, and tackle it with hundreds of players. If enough players are present to down the hunt, it's not an early pull. It's absolutely the hunts at fault when fighting them with the intended amount of players brings the wrath of the entire server upon you, because everyone wants a slice of the loot pie.

[ServerCollaps]

Hunts were designed with inclusiveness in mind, not for one group to control them like FFXI NMs circa 2005.

thats wrong, they were designed as exclusive, competetive content a la first comes first serves

b ranks for solo persons, a ranks for small groups and s ranks for larger amounts of people

[ElHeggunte]

thats wrong, they were designed as exclusive, competetive content a la first comes first serves

b ranks for solo persons, a ranks for small groups and s ranks for larger amounts of people

If Hunts were as cutthroat competitive as some people like to think, anyone outside of the claiming party would be SoL when it came to rewards. Still being able to earn kill credit even when the mob is purple to you suggests that Hunts are supposed to be inclusive. You don't gain anything from secretly killing hunts by yourself anyway so there's absolutely no reason not to wait for other players that you know are on their way.