Diadem Leeches

[KeluBehemoth]

Things you need to know about Diadem (Legit and Leech alike).

*If you enter an encounter and agree upon pre-discussed loot rules (whether in DF or PF) you may liable to "Fruad" if you go against the agreed upon rules.
This is not exclusive to the Diadem. This also covers "Locking" loot, Agreements made upon someone receiving loot for a class they may not roll Need on, such as a DPS/Healer class who is substituting in an encounter as a Tank or any other pre discussed loot distribution agreements.


*If you enter an encounter and refuse to participate either by declaring verbally or non verbally, you may be held liable for "Refusal of Participation".

Both of these are offences against the games ToS and you may receive disciplinary action if a player/s chooses to report you.




How to protect yourself?

If you don't agree to the parties discussed loot distribution rules, than you should make sure to DISAGREE with them. In the event that you AGREE with them, you are bound to comply.

As for Refusal to Participate? If you are unable to participate, simply exit the duty. Life happens, sometimes this may not be an option. It is very easy to determine some one who is AFK Vs. Some one who is leeching. (Some one who is AFK - Away from keyboard; obviously will not be rolling on loot).


Simply stating things such as "Well don't blame me, blame the system" are unacceptable excuses and this behaviour must not be tolerated within the community for the betterment of everyone involved.

I have provided the information above for the community in order to better mediate itself by understanding that these actions are against the Terms of Service and those who participate in "Griefing" "Fraud" and "Harassment" will not be tolerated"



There are a number of possible future solutions which may be implemented to alleviate these problems, however I will not go into discussing those in the main post as this is mostly directed at changing the behaviour of the community by holding members accounable, rather than placing a band-aid fix on a larger issue.

[Colorful]

Happens every time with content, they think too highly of their playerbase and never learn that there's always some people out there that's going to ruin it for everyone else. Since there's no fixing people, they should be creating content with that in mind.

[Risvertasashi]

Happens every time with content, they think too highly of their playerbase and never learn that there's always some people out there that's going to ruin it for everyone else. Since there's no fixing people, they should be creating content with that in mind.

Actually, this is why vote dismiss was put in in the first place.

The problem is they disabled it, and designed content without a linear goal (ie people come in for different reasons, such as gathering).

[Colorful]

Actually, this is why vote dismiss was put in in the first place.

The problem is they disabled it, and designed content without a linear goal (ie people come in for different reasons, such as gathering).

Well I can't blame them on having gathering and battle content being in the same instance, how long have people been asking for that now? Still, it turned out to be a horrible idea. There may have been a better way to implement it, but I can't think of any that wouldn't peeve the players who are only interested in battling.

[Jynx]

There may have been a better way to implement it.

Not putting it in the duty finder would have solved all these problems. Then every group that went in has clear expectations on why they are going in. This is a clear example of content that should never have been shoved into the duty finder.

[KeluBehemoth]

Not putting it in the duty finder would have solved all these problems. Then every group that went in has clear expectations on why they are going in. This is a clear example of content that should never have been shoved into the duty finder.

This is a clear example of why the community needs to change. Simply saying that you should expect the worst from DF isn't how you solve anything. Back in the day playing WoW this was never an issue when playing with random people. There are certain expectations of etiquette in games that are to be followed. Unfortunately the "Call of Duty" generation has no idea what that is.

[Eight]

I can see it both ways though, if you're someone who wants to go on the quest to gather should you excluded or made to think you can't go cause your not fighting? Honestly they really should get rid of the whole 4 currents thing at the start and just let you fly from the start and allow you to go in solo if you wanna gather or fish.

Roll wise I guess that's up to the player I mean if I went in to strictly gather I personally wouldn't roll but many probably will. Maybe they could include something in which you actually need to do a little damage before you can roll or be within a certain proximity kind of like fates to get credit on the fight.

[AlphaFox]

They assume we are japanese I suppose? Cus we are no where near as polite as they seem to be. I mean closed beta they actually formed a line as I recall due to only 1 person being able to do the Gridania quest at a time? NA/EU was a scramble "Lol good luck getting in"

[Pence]

They assume we are japanese I suppose? Cus we are no where near as polite as they seem to be. I mean closed beta they actually formed a line as I recall due to only 1 person being able to do the Gridania quest at a time? NA/EU was a scramble "Lol good luck getting in"

I can assure you, leeching and lotting happens by JP players also.

[Jican]

They assume we are japanese I suppose? Cus we are no where near as polite as they seem to be. I mean closed beta they actually formed a line as I recall due to only 1 person being able to do the Gridania quest at a time? NA/EU was a scramble "Lol good luck getting in"

I don't know about you, but Ultros was very civil as well.