Things need to explain: Bunny Ears

[Pomelo]

The fact there is a male and female locked set this patch is a minor step in the right direction, yes.
That's one new set each.

Except; Female Characters get a whole new Gold Saucer set as well, Male Characters do not. We don't even want the whole set, we want the ears.
I bet that before we get the ears for male characters, several female characters will complain that they love our new male set and bang...guess what is unisex.

Read what you quoted. No where does it promise "male will get gender-balance gear from the Gold Saucer section".

Yeah it sucks that the head items aren't unisex when they said they will consider modifying head equips to fit males, but telling lies about what was and wasn't promised helps no one.

Except the quote was a response to our thread asking for bunny ears for male characters, way back when gold saucer was first released.

[kuma_aus]

There is a big difference between demanding an explanation for a promise that was never made and asking why the stuff they said they were considering hasn't been put into effect.

[RyuRoots]

Want some cheese with your whine, guys? This isn't an actual social issue and the glamour options are not nearly as weighted as some people here would like to suggest. Also, please learn to read. the posts says they'll consider the requests, and say they'll make more male gear "in the future", not "in 3.1, as soon as you desire oh merciful masters". So just relax. Though honestly the more of these whiny threads I see the more it seems to be less about glamour and more about men having just as much or more than women even in fiction and the opposite is just outrageous (apparently).

[Ashkendor]

Want some cheese with your whine, guys? This isn't an actual social issue and the glamour options are not nearly as weighted as some people here would like to suggest. Also, please learn to read. the posts says they'll consider the requests, and say they'll make more male gear "in the future", not "in 3.1, as soon as you desire oh merciful masters". So just relax. Though honestly the more of these whiny threads I see the more it seems to be less about glamour and more about men having just as much or more than women even in fiction and the opposite is just outrageous (apparently).

There's always gotta be at least one person (of course playing a female character) that rolls up in the thread to whine at us that we're just whining and that this couldn't possibly be a legitimate issue. Serilda actually links a post on the next page that quite nicely sums up just how weighted the options really are. A cursory inspection of the patch notes shows that it's continuing in this patch despite them telling us twice now (the first of which was a few months ago) that the discrepancy will be "addressed in the future."

So, what, we're just supposed to sit back and wait while the status quo continues patch after patch? Okay.

[Kling-Klang]

This really sucks, I dont see the big deal if male characters can wear bunny ears too.
I was thinking they would at least allow the new ears be for males too. Just disappointing.

[Ymal]

Lol.

People who says this doesn't matter = female characters. No surprise here.

Female characters get three female only new glamour sets this patch.

Just by reading the patch info there are 7 female only new gear and 2 male only new gear, without counting the Minfilia outfit (that i guess is a 5 set piece). If I'm not mistaking this will make female only glamour at a number near 40 gear piece. vs 2 for male. (and those 2 pieces have a female counterpart, so we can see it as no exclusive set?)

If we are being honest yes this is the first male only gear we had in a loooong time (+6months to make two pieces of gear oh yeah) but fo real though'
BALANCE MUCH IMMA RIGHT.

[Gilraen]

Not that I don't want to see Highlanders and Roegadyn in bunny suits, but the shoulderless top and bent ears have been something people have asked for since they saw the early promotional pictures for the set only to find one of the the two available instead of both. Wasn't a huge demand, mind, but it was considered a strange omission given they had characters wearing them side by side in the group shots.

[Serilda]

Not that I don't want to see Highlanders and Roegadyn in bunny suits, but the shoulderless top and bent ears have been something people have asked for since they saw the early promotional pictures for the set only to find one of the the two available instead of both. Wasn't a huge demand, mind, but it was considered a strange omission given they had characters wearing them side by side in the group shots.

Responding here: http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...=1#post3416049

(Sorry but I really do think it's less confusing not to split the issue T_T)

[Eul]

Responding here: http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...=1#post3416049

(Sorry but I really do think it's less confusing not to split the issue T_T)

Not sure if I put some bandage to prevent confuse topic, I put that thread on first post /shrug

[Pomelo]

I suppose imma have to cave and go fem roe again.