Is that the weirdest detail to you? I thought it was the nerf of all 2.0 dungeon in NORMAL mode, plus garuda NORMAL.


Is that the weirdest detail to you? I thought it was the nerf of all 2.0 dungeon in NORMAL mode, plus garuda NORMAL.


That's not weird it was expected. Those I'm referring to do not make any sense. The nerfs are logical as content adds up. Imagine how many dungeons we will have when 4.0 arrive and adds all those from the 3.X it's kinda too much for newcomers as older players move to the new content fewer will queue for the older content. 2.X dungeons will be solo dungeons or doable with NPCs at some point in the future. The content will simply be too much for normal queue times but let's stay on our topic now.
Last edited by Riardon; 11-07-2015 at 06:57 PM.
Player


I give you that point (even if it never happened to me).
But
Nerfing content because more content are added, that doesn't make any more sense. A content is nerf because not enough people can clear it and/or the difficulty was higher than expected, because people complain about their difficulty.
Dare tell me Sastasha is hard as fuck.
I think the second issue is easily forgetting that Normal Garuda still falls under the needing to be behind rocks during her ultimate that isn't used in hard mode anymore. So it's easy for even a veteran player to wipe because they simply forget that mechanic.


No you don't! The damage from Aerial Blast is purely determined by how much of the rocks is left. There is no reduction from standing behind the rocks.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



