Consoles are holding this game back (graphically)

[Azazua_azura]

it was the the polygon count actually with the flower pot, they made the flower pot as realistic as they graphically could. it had the count of a player character.

Also name 1 game with realistic textures w/o any odd graphical layout. If you are looking for graphical iregularity you will see it.

also, the engine ff14 runs on is scaleable. where in ff14 1.0 they used the crystal tools engine. I didn't like animations from 1.0 running looked clunky with that sudden stop, if you walk 2 inches ur character looked like it was limping.

[Colorful]

snip

Without odd graphical layout, what's that supposed to mean? If you mean that all textures are perfect, there are none, but that's not what people are asking for. We're just asking for something that didn't look like someone smeared paint onto something, that's not a texture, that's a mess. Sometimes I can literally see the pixels in the texture. But if you want me to list some games that have great textures where it counts, Grand Theft Auto V, Witcher 3, Metro Last Light, Killing Floor 2, etc. There's more than plenty.

[Gilraen]

...but that's not what people are asking for.

Quite, the lalafell asked how the PS3 version doesn't play properly. Until May or so of this year I played on the PS3 and was able to run any content at the time, even farmed Coil for a bit (as much as one can without beating Twintania, anyway). 'People' wave graphics around like they are the end-all be-all of a game but some of us just don't care. My all time favorite games are from consoles that were old when some of you were toddling about. You know, when game graphics were measured in bits. I still play some of them. So I have to parrot the lalafell's question, cause all you've done is belittle them for not thinking like you and sidestepped the question altogether.