Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. 10-12-2011 09:38 PM #1
    Fensfield
    Player
    Fensfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    677
    Character
    Forra Descren
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 70

    Lodestone: Outdated Command Listing

    So.. I just spent a half hour farting about with command macros only to discover with some digging that the item slot name tags for text commands have been changed.

    Would you be so kind as to update http://lodestone.finalfantasyxiv.com...e/macro01.html to reflect this change, so that I and others aren't mislead by the official helpfiles in the future?

    For instance, it seems that while the Main Hand slot is still listed as being referred to with the tag 'main', it is in fact now called by the tag 'mh'.

    Thanks!
    (3)
    Roleplay Profile: http://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/showthread.php?tid=961&pid=15275#pid15275
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-04-2011 03:20 AM #2
    Fazrenar
    Player
    Fazrenar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    27
    Character
    Faz Talan
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    YES PLEASE

    This annoyed me a few days ago... when I needed to look something up.

    Get onto it guys.. macros changed ages ago!
    (2)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-29-2012 08:14 AM #3
    ommos
    Player
    ommos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    20
    Character
    Ommos Ravenger
    World
    Masamune
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 80
    Up Vote

    And also the /job <subcommand>, where <subcommand> is 'on' or 'off' is not in the list.
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 05-15-2012 10:09 PM #4
    Beebo
    Player
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    1
    Snap, wasted time looking up the Lodestone macro guide today only to find it wrong. Not the end of the world really, but then to find out that for the last 7 months this hasn't been addressed, now that made me cross enough to write in.
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »