Thread: 3.1 First update without a new primal?

Originally Posted by Belhi

On the actual topic, the reason they might not have shared details is that it could be that any trials attached to the MSQ would be spoilery.

The trailers and inital MSQ hinted at Ramuh, spoiled Shiva and possibly also hinted at Leviathan. Bismarch and Ravanawere also promoted in the lead up to Heavensward (Then again they're aren't as spoilery as Alexander and Thordian)

Originally Posted by Morningstar1337

The trailers and inital MSQ hinted at Ramuh, spoiled Shiva and possibly also hinted at Leviathan. Bismarch and Ravanawere also promoted in the lead up to Heavensward (Then again they're aren't as spoilery as Alexander and Thordian)

I'm not disagreeing. I would point out though Im mentioning trial, not primal. We didn't get a new primal trial in 2.5 either unless you count Battle at Big Keep (which did technically have a primal in it), but the patch did have 3 trials. The direction the story is going to go isn't as clear in HW as ARR and frankly I suspect that might be intentional.

Also my main point is really we probably shouldn't be leaping to conclusions. We won't know for sure what content is in the patch till it launches which makes anything we say here dubious in accuracy.

Originally Posted by Belhi

I'm not disagreeing. I would point out though Im mentioning trial, not primal. We didn't get a new primal trial in 2.5 either unless you count Battle at Big Keep (which did technically have a primal in it). The direction the story is going to go isn't as clear in HW as ARR and frankly I suspect that might be intentional.

Also my main point is really we probably shouldn't be leaping to conclusions. We won't know for sure what content is in the patch till it launches which makes anything we say here dubious in accuracy.

We got Urth's Fount with 2.5 (Odin).