Improved LS management

[Sindy]

Hi I'd like to see a few improvement to LS mangement. This would include the ability to remove inactive members. Display member location, class, and level. I would others help develop this thread for a better game for everyone.

[Chibino]

i agree LS need a form of management. but i think you also need when the account was last logged in and when the pearl was last equipped. this way you can see if someone that actively plays if they ever use the pearl.

[VisionHolder]

I completely agree with the above. I need the ability to clean up my LS membership list, but I would also like to see when people last used the shell, as well as their current job/level and location.

[Sephsta]

Yep, I agree! this is a must!

[XenoZero]

I 100% agree with this, im honestly tired of re-pearling my LS, when we hit around 100+ members, we defiantly need a way to kick in-active members.

I always have to promote or kick when they are online and in the same zone.

I would like to not be kicked from the game almost every time I look at my LS roster

And please allow a 'invite to party menu from the LS roster, as well as add a "/lscmd add "Player Name" to invite players from afar, Anima is a rarity

[Coombah]

I agree with everyone so far the only thing I can think to add to this is /lsmes!!!!!!

[XenoZero]

I agree with everyone so far the only thing I can think to add to this is /lsmes!!!!!!

i also agree with /lsmes

[Chibino]

i agree, LinkShells need a way to keep members informed and usually "message of the day" like how when players log in you see the daily message from the server which usually says "welcome to <server>" but like this there should be a linkshell message to remind members of up coming events, LS website, voice chat info, etc....

[Baelari]

I would like to be able to search the member list for people with certain level jobs. This would be helpful when I need something crafted, or when I'm hoping to put together a static party.

I'm also in favor of adding /lsmes

Also, even though this isn't really website-related, please add another bit or two to the linkshell size. 128 doesn't seem to be enough, especially if you can't kick members out without them being online.

[Chibino]

Also, even though this isn't really website-related, please add another bit or two to the linkshell size. 128 doesn't seem to be enough, especially if you can't kick members out without them being online.

i rather have a way to kick or manage the LS even with off-line users i dont think 128 limit for members is bad. keep limitation is good thing it helps regulate... we still have companies still to be released. if companies are an upgraded version of LS where companies them self can rank up then i see why there is a need a limitless members for LS/companies. if anything i want to see LS/Companies form Alliances... maybe a limit of 5 LS/Companies per alliance.

there is many different types of LS/Companies other then all-purpose LS/Co. you have some that specialize in role-play, or some focus on crafting. we all know of end-game LS/Co. but you also have LS/Companies that have grown to large and split into lower ranking and end game content LS/Co but these still need a way to communicate with each other. you can say raise the limitation of 128 members but i personally dont think creating a large LS/Company to replace the lack of world chat is not good either. personally i perfer smaller scale group of people that i can bond with that share similar goals.