I don't see what is lawful neutral from fighting primals and ascians that want to suck the world's life force dry.
I don't see what is lawful neutral from fighting primals and ascians that want to suck the world's life force dry.



I was more arguing against the point that we're going Chaotic Good.
We're definitely Lawful, since we're following Hydaelyn's greater will and command. Whether we want to follow the orders or not isn't even in the equation, we simply are, even if, as the DRK quest states, we don't always like it. That's entirely what Lawful characters do.
The Neutral is more from the idea that's being spread through the thread (whether or not you agree with it) that the Warrior is taking a bit of a darker turn. I'd say, if we are going "darker," rather than going from Lawful Good to Chaotic Good, we slipped from Lawful Good to Lawful Neutral. It's more the matter of us possibly having to go through with actions we don't necessarily agree with in the future at Hydaelyn's command. So far, she's been (seemingly) benevolent. In the future, we might not always agree with her will and decisions or they may conflict with something else that needs to be done. However, if we wish to retain her Blessing, we would need to follow the orders through. That is how we may end up as Lawful Neutral.
Last edited by CyrilLucifer; 10-14-2015 at 12:16 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote

