While I largely agree, I think it'd much be easier to drop the notion of transvestism, as that's probably where the comparison to transgender people comes from.
And lmao, I agree that the "fitting feminine outfits on male models is hard" is likely nonsense, but that's just their main reasoning.
Okay, it's a fairly simple concept, Women have the freedom to either conform to gender roles (Which is seen as weak by society) or emulate men (Which are seen by strong by society), men lack this option and are given one option "be men", because a man shouldn't lower himself to more "womanly" things (according to society as is, anyways). This is part of concepts that feminists have pointed out like toxic masculinity (Where men have to be men! If they wear 'women's' clothes they're weak) and the concept that masculinity is seen as desirable, but not femininity (Hence why one is unisex, but not the other)... Now there's plenty of further discussion and talk about the various concepts, but that's a base level description of it. There's a lot to discuss with regards to societal concepts of gender and how they interact with each other.
I feel you there, but I don't really get how it'd be harder, I mean, they'd basically just do the same thing but with a "flat" model instead of a "boob" model or whatever. But hey I don't know much about it, but I'm sure it's possible.
Try actually reading some of the feminist theories that have been evolving and going on since the 40s (At least in a mainstream sense)... But nah, it's just "nutcases" obviously. You're being incredibly shallow and defensive over a lot of well discussed social theories on gender.
Tumblr has a lot of people, like neo nazis too you know. It's how the social media platform is built, due to the way to refine and essentially ignore anyone you don't feel like interacting with. Trying to use it as a scapegoat when you mean "people talking about feminism" is silly due to the sites' structure.
What on earth are you people talking about? Like, lmao, games (and parts of anymedia) have always been used to address real world concepts and "drama". I mean, heck do we need to get into the discussion about the what the heck Tetris brought to the plate in terms of "real life drama"? Plus.. This is FF, it's been talking about religious institutions and other "real life drama" things for a while now. Let's not even talk about "fantasy" as a genre and how it's always dealt with real life issues.
I don't know where these folks get this idea that video games were always apolitical and had nothing to do with the real world. Who do you think makes these games ffs, supranatural beings with no connection to the real world?