Results 1 to 5 of 5

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Kaisha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    361
    Character
    Kaishen Commodore
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 80

    Gnath enemy naming discrepency

    Minor nitpick.

    In the Japanese client in the Dravanian Forelands (X27, Y36), the lvl52 Gnaths and lvl57 Gnaths are named differently from one another (グナース & ロス respectively) followed by their class type, but in the English client they're all just simply prefixed with Gnath, no Loss (Loth?) for the higher tier enemies.

    Might confuse some players since the Hunt bills specifically want the lvl57 enemies in that camp, but the lvl52's have identical names to the target as well.
    (6)
    Last edited by Kaisha; 10-12-2015 at 09:14 AM.

  2. #2
    Player
    RhynAzullo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    167
    Character
    Azullo Winterclaw
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 80
    This confused me the first time I got those, for that very reason. Afterwards I always realized it would be the level 57 ones, but it would be nice if the names were differentiated in the English version as well since they already seem to be in Japanese.
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player
    RhynAzullo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    167
    Character
    Azullo Winterclaw
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 80
    By the way, this looks like it's been fixed now. The level 57 mobs are called Loth now instead of Gnath to match the Japanese.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Kaisha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    361
    Character
    Kaishen Commodore
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 80
    Yep, looks like the update on the 24th addressed it, but wasn't mentioned in the notes.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Dev Team Corvinoobus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    262
    Ah, yeah, I neglected to thank y'all for bringing this one to our attention. As you can see, we've since taken care of it. Cheers!
    (12)