But you were the one trying to convince me that that's how it would work. The process in this thread:
1)why not have parsers?
2)because harassment!
3)how do they cause harassment?
4)how do they not cause harassment?
Do you see how number 4 kinda jumps off topic? If we're talking about why not to implement a parser, and people say because of harassment, then they are making the positive claim that harassment and parsers have a causal relationship. If you're making a positive claim then the burden of proof is on you.
You can't tell me to prove why your own argument isn't true if you can't even provide any evidence that it is true.