parse for ps4 users !

[LaylaTsarra]

I have, and her points have been answered again and again.

Oh you mean like the half dozen or so pro parsers in here who repeat themselves on a daily basis or the OP who continually and shamelessly bumps this thread daily with little or nothing new to add. If you aren't pro parser in here you aren't welcome obviously and there have been plenty of reasoned replies as to why parsers would be an issue in places like duty finder. It doesn't take many people to make the playing field toxic and I strongly believe that if they are approved that is exactly what will happen. The negatives to implementing official parsers outweigh the positives and is why many people are opposed to them.

[Archaell]

The negatives to implementing official parsers outweigh the positives and is why many people are opposed to them.

The assumption that negatives outweight the positives is why many people are opposed to them. Fixed it for ya.

[Odett]

Oh you mean like the half dozen or so pro parsers in here who repeat themselves on a daily basis or the OP who continually and shamelessly bumps this thread daily with little or nothing new to add. If you aren't pro parser in here you aren't welcome obviously and there have been plenty of reasoned replies as to why parsers would be an issue in places like duty finder. It doesn't take many people to make the playing field toxic and I strongly believe that if they are approved that is exactly what will happen. The negatives to implementing official parsers outweigh the positives and is why many people are opposed to them.

You read my post and that's all you got out of it?

The only reason why so many players are repeating themselves is because their questions are always conveniently left unanswered (like you just did right now).

[Whiteroom]

Oh you mean like the half dozen or so pro parsers in here who repeat themselves on a daily basis or the OP who continually and shamelessly bumps this thread daily with little or nothing new to add. If you aren't pro parser in here you aren't welcome obviously and there have been plenty of reasoned replies as to why parsers would be an issue in places like duty finder. It doesn't take many people to make the playing field toxic and I strongly believe that if they are approved that is exactly what will happen. The negatives to implementing official parsers outweigh the positives and is why many people are opposed to them.

Could you list the negatives and positives as you see them? In point form. I believe we know most of the reasons behind each point this far into the thread.
I'm actually really interested in what you see in them, that you would rate them as being more negative than positive.

And please....... stop using level and endgame as part of credibility. thats just stupid.

Tbh, it does lend a little bit of credibility. It shows that you actually play all of the content, and therfore can understand better what people are saying when the referance certian content to make a point. It also shows that you have put in at least bit of time to your classes and should have a better understanding of how each role opperates in each bit of content. It would probably take less time and effort to take a clss from 50-60, than she has put into this thread is a bit telling. Now obviously we don't know how hard she played the game prior to HW, but it is a little extreme to not have one of the jobs fully leveled by now. So well it is not the be all and end all of credibility. It can be a bit telling.

[Sapphic]

Oh you mean like the half dozen or so pro parsers in here who repeat themselves on a daily basis

Oh you mean like the half dozen or so anti parsers in here who repeat themselves on a daily basis or who continually and shamelessly bumps this thread daily with little or nothing new to add.

As stated, a LOT of toxicity comes because of players underperforming to the content requirements and stopping players from clearing content. As since I first saw parsers in EQ1 I have only had one case of getting called out on my results, when I decided to try DPS for the first time.

Then in numerous MMOs which use parsers I have NEVER seen this imagined toxicity that anti-parser users keep throwing out there.

Addon support IS coming, according to SE. So you better get used to getting a parser as that WILL be one of the first addons created for it.

you guys ignore the answers simple as that.

You pass off pro parser stuff as fact when it isn't, its all assumption and conjecture.

Yet you are passing off your assumption, conjecture and personal opinon as be all and end all fact. Your opinions are not more valid than anyone elses unless you have solid, tangible proof to refute it. Which you have not. Only personal opinion/experience. My personal experience with MMOs that incorporated parsers in one form or another are contrary to yours and just because it is contrary does not make an assumption or conjecture.

You saying it will cause more toxicity is conjecture as you cannot predict the future, you can only base you opinions on experience and as commonly the case, biase.