Would you play FFXIV if it had action combat?

[Fevelle]

What about Type 0 and Crisis Core? Both of those were very fast paced.

I have Type 0 but didn't play it yet (my Wii U/FFXIV is taking all my free time) and Crisis Core wasn't really fun to me, however I didn't find it very fast paced (mostly because of the annoying "Modulating Phases" or maybe I was still under the "Dissidia effect" when I played it). Even DoC, a game that's the absolute opposite of what I expect from a FF game was more enjoyable to be honest.

[UBERHAXED]

I have Type 0 but didn't play it yet (my Wii U/FFXIV is taking all my free time) and Crisis Core wasn't really fun to me, however I didn't find it very fast paced (mostly because of the annoying "Modulating Phases" or maybe I was still under the "Dissidia effect" when I played it). Even DoC, a game that's the absolute opposite of what I expect from a FF game was more enjoyable to be honest.

Don't bother play type-0, it's 100% action combat. Also seems weird you are skipping action based combat when you've played FF games with far more action than what was in XV (demo), e.g Dissidia. I really fail to think you are skipping a game that you have never played do to a combat system that you have never played given contradictory reasoning.

[Colorful]

Don't bother play type-0, it's 100% action combat. Also seems weird you are skipping action based combat when you've played FF games with far more action than what was in XV (demo), e.g Dissidia. I really fail to think you are skipping a game that you have never played do to a combat system that you have never played given contradictory reasoning.

I'm a big fan of action games, but Type-0 was 100% trash in that regard, it really did feel like a PSP game. The camera control was so wonky I could barely play as the Ninja equivalent (Rem) due to the camera jumping all over. I would recommend playing it for the story if you can get past the subpar gameplay, one of the few games that made me genuinely cry at the ending. I do hope they fix up the controls with Type-1 or whatever they're going to call it.

[Fevelle]

Don't bother play type-0, it's 100% action combat. Also seems weird you are skipping action based combat when you've played FF games with far more action than what was in XV (demo), e.g Dissidia. I really fail to think you are skipping a game that you have never played do to a combat system that you have never played given contradictory reasoning.

Dissidia is a fighting game with some RPG elements (namely levels/equips), not an actual RPG. Also, it had a menu-based combat option that made it feel like an fast ATB game. I have other reasons to not like FFXV, like ambientation, character design, party composition etc. I will still try to play it, but I think I'll skip it and focus on the other two big RPG titles I'm looking for next year.

EDIT: And I had the most important reason to play Dissidia and 012: seeing all the story interactions of my 'favorite media character of all time' with the other protagonists.

[UBERHAXED]

Dissidia is a fighting game with some RPG elements (namely levels/equips), not an actual RPG. Also, it had a menu-based combat option that made it feel like an fast ATB game. I have other reasons to not like FFXV, like ambientation, character design, party composition etc. I will still try to play it, but I think I'll skip it and focus on the other two big RPG titles I'm looking for next year.

EDIT: And I had the most important reason to play Dissidia and 012: seeing all the story interactions of my 'favorite media character of all time' with the other protagonists.

Not that I believe that you are wrong, but the game isn't out yet and what you seen in trailers isn't the game. The only thing we got out out demos was the battle system. Everything else, like character design can be changed on the fly since the game is still in development. And apparently, they will delay the game for more years (apparently given the announcement in 2006, 9 years ago) since time isn't an issue for changing design.