If I may interject, I am also curious to see how the face lift on ancient magic has improved things. There was one post in the conjurer forum, and a very happy post in the Japanese forum, but I'd like to hear more.
If I may interject, I am also curious to see how the face lift on ancient magic has improved things. There was one post in the conjurer forum, and a very happy post in the Japanese forum, but I'd like to hear more.



All conj attack magic is doing more than all THM attack magic. Shadowsear is laughable, while ancient magic does in the 1000's aoe
So what you meant in your original post is:
"I am first opening a thread to ask people a nice simple question, and having my own opinion and formed my own conclusions on this before even opening the thread, I am now going to harp on about how THM sucks".

AM isnt aoe anymore. shadowsear rawks even more so with chainspell and the AM has like a 90 sec cast time. DMG Thm>cnj Heals cnj>thm. thread closed pick if you wanna heal or damage easy choices are easy



No, AM is aoe. I watched it being cast duoing with a 50 con.
And I didn't start this post to say THM is gimped, I was only answering a question.
I guess I should ask those who have both L50 in THM and CON if they actually played and experimented with both classes after 1.19, or at least payed attention in combat to other L50 THM and CON.
Last edited by Reika; 10-11-2011 at 12:27 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



