Unless that player had been deleted, why would you ever consider removing them from your blist?200 might work if we had a simpler way of deleting the top (oldest) 100 or so whenever we need more room. Having to do it one by one is just such a chore. If we had twice the space, it'd still fill up and we'd be trying to one by one delete 200 of our 400 names. Twice as laborious half as often is pretty much a wash.
If it's filled with RMT spammers (rather than legitimate players you just don't like), then they're going to be banned in a few weeks to a month or two. There's no need for them to remain on there longer than that. I might (and do) wish SE was quicker about banning them, but it does happen eventually. So deleting the oldest entries (if they're RMT) doesn't matter because they're generally gone anyway, so it's a fairly safe way to free up space (just a tedious one).
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



