

We'll see my friend, we'll see. If 3.2 doesn't bring anything for you Paladin fellows, I'm sure all the tank community including us, Dark Knights and Warriors, will scream for you.Square doesn't give a shit about Paladin, they never have since 2.1. It's only becoming more and more evident with how terrible they're trying to cover the issue up with band aid fixes left and right. We're not going to be fixed until everyone pushes Square's shit in and demands that they fix the situation they've created. 3.2 won't bring anything to Paladin as of right now, I guarantee it.
Incidentally, to respond to the actual title of this thread:
I wouldn't like to see WAR "nerfed" directly, but I do want to see some reworking of the job to become more in line with the other tanks. Right now WAR is largely superior as an OT and due to the fact that they benefit from using their defensive buffs for DPS and do not benefit from tanking very much (the reflect from Vengeance being the only thing), they've basically become a glorified DPS that only tanks if they have to.
I think it would be a healthy thing to reduce the potency on Fell Cleave and move it elsewhere. Making Fell Cleave and Inner Beast closer in potency would encourage the stance-dance-to-mitigate play that SE says they imagined instead of the avoid-Defiance-like-cancer play we have now.
Right now WAR in terms of DPS has:
The highest OT DPS in vacuum
The lowest potency gain for tanking period
Unlimited TP
It would be good to adjust it not so much because OMG WAR OP, but because this tends to force the other tank into the MT role and WAR into the OT role. It would also be good if WAR had resource management, but I think we're more likely to see the other two tanks get more and more TP buffs gradually until none of the tanks ever run out of TP.
Last edited by eagledorf; 11-09-2015 at 03:30 PM.
http://bit.do/PLD_A4S
I'm gonna' call everyone's bluff on this statement. People are already dismissing the Paladin issue solely based on the Shield Swipe change. The community, in two months time, will have forgotten everything that has been talked about here, they'll forget every single piece of numerical data that has been shown directly exposing the issue, they'll forget just why Warrior fits in every single thing despite being just the "DPS tank" that's "more squishy" than the rest.
If I'm pissing people off, good, that means you won't forget now. That means you'll think back to when I said we're given nothing but band aid fixes or explicitly catered to for just a short while and then forgotten again. I wouldn't be surprised if it ACTUALLY gets worse for Paladins in the future. I'm tired of standing up and screaming to be heard....and now I'm gonna' log off and try to do....something, I don't know anymore.

Unlikely, a few will, but most don't understand why Pld is weak, since they do not raid, and of course you will get those people that will just "Lol, good thing I am not you, but too bad", mostly warrior players atm.
But yes, Plds were asking for buffs in the early weeks of Alexander Savage. This is when several forums appeared with Plds wanting buffs to dps/aggro/utilities because they all felt lacking in Savage. Responses we got was, "Git Gud" "You have your shield only party" "HALLOWED GROUND." You had your time in 2.0" There was even a very active poster that downright tried to single handly keep Pld gimp, and tried to stop Pld needs buff threads, but showing the evidence "HOW MUCH STRONGER PLD WAS TO THE OTHER CLASSES" with little data on actual combat situtations with Pld. So I don't think 3.2 will be much different if Pld remains gimped.
It also really doesn't help that Yoshida himself is saying this stuff too, like Pld does less dps because of shield/HG, and is best defensive tank. Yet Pld dies when there is a continuous amounts of magical dmg...look at the first floor of Alexnader Savage THE FIRST FLOOR HG becomes just another common cd you use in a rotation, and let allow if you get the rarity of having 4 jumps...oops Pld has no more cds...and dies while other tanks are fine...best defensive tank...not really, so Pld doing less dmg doesn't justify itself at all in magical encounters. I just find it really messed up that Yoshida prefers to go by this FoTM tank garbage, then balancing the tanks. If this doesn't change Drk might be the next victim in 3.2, and Yoshida will just say well...Drk just doesn't fit in the content, but the job is fine, and so doesn't need a buff...wait a month or more to get better gear to do a encounter that the other tanks already did a month ago. Balance!
Last edited by Isius; 11-10-2015 at 10:58 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


