But we know he wasnt sealed as he is somehow a part of the warring triad which is locked in Azys Lla.
Which kind of makes sense giving the history of the Warring Triad in the FF series. Its by no means certain, buts darn sure near a sure bet given Yoshida's obsession with FF6 that Odin, Wiyu, and Urth are somehow related to Goddess, Demon, and Fiend.
Technically, yes. They do.
Don't get me wrong, your point about the versions of each Primal manifesting itself as a twisted version of the summoner's wishes is accurate, but that doesn't mean that they don't have a will of their own. The sheer act of tempering implies that each primal does, in fact, have their own will that they can impose upon others. Not only that, every Primal is capable of speech and has desires that do not necessarily match the wishes of their summoners.
Consider Ramuh, for example. The sylphs are afraid of people invading the forest. If they had their way, they'd have Ramuh fry everything that came into the forest (that's made pretty evident from majority of the dialogue we get from both sides of the sylphs), but you don't see him going off and murdering every Garlean or Gridanian he comes across. He has his own set of values and holds a court, passing judgement using logic (mostly, The combat trial thing didn't really fit with his persona, but I guess they needed some excuse for us to actually fight him). He reflects the wishes of his summoners, but he is not a slave to their will. They wanted him to kill us and be done with it. He chose to give us a fair trial.
The story of Bahamut (as well as the dialogue from the coils) made me suspicious that there are more to Primals than their summoners as well. They definitely reflect a twisted version of their summoner's wishes, but they also retain a personality that is distinctly different from that of the original deity they were supposed to be. It's as though they only managed to summon half of the Primal (the bad half).
In either case, every primal shows examples of defying the will of their summoner in favour of expressing their own will at one point or another. More than them seemingly having no will at all and being only what they are summoned, it would seem more likely that they are simply taking advantage of the wishes of those who called on them, which in and of itself would imply they have a will of their own. Personally, I am suspicious that all of the Primals have an origin in Zodiark's circle of influence (The dark side of existence, if you follow the whole Zodiark/Hydelyn thing) and merely take the form of the Primal that suits them best. That would also imply that there is a light side as well that does not manifest (likely the original deity that disappeared long ago).
The questionable status of Odin, Urth, and Wiyu is what seems to be causing a lot of confusion, actually.
I would have assumed that the three of them are dead as well, given the time period we're talking about; however, there has been a lot of talk about Helix, the warring triad and a possible connection between these three characters. Also, it would not be the first time we've seen people from the Allagan period whom we assumed were dead turn out to be alive and well (Xande, for example).
As far as in-game proof deciding it one way or another, the only thing we have to go on is Odin's dialogue in which he explicitly says he's looking for Urth. It's possible that he thinks he's still back in a time when Urth is still alive, but then why make a comment like "Here I stand, a God among men?" Back in his day, he was simply a warrior (a damn good one, but still), not a God. If he's in the mindset that he's still back in time, than he must have had one hell of an ego... either that, or he really was on the verge of attaining Godhood. That being said, with Allagan technology, it is entirely possible that the three of them are, in fact, still alive and are just sealed up somewhere.
We've already been through the distinction between "Eikon" and "Primal." You can go back and have a look at that link that was posted a few times. It has the Dev notes in it.
Unukhalai says there is a difference, but the Dev team has explicitly stated, clear as day, that the term "Eikon" is the just an older version of the word "Primal." The distinction between the two seems to be geographical (as Eikon was used by Allagans and Garleans); so, we can infer from this that when Unukhalai says he's referring to Eikon's that we are not acquainted with, the most we can assume is that they are from lands that we are not familiar with yet. Ie: we've never seen any Primals from Allagan history, save for Bahamut, whom they called an Eikon, and we call a Elder Primal, and we certainly don't know of any Garlean Primals, whom the Garleans would also refer to as Eikons as they adopted the term form the Allagans.
For the most part, yes. This seems to be the chain of events; however there are certain parts we don't know for sure.
1. As you said, we don't know why Urth was against the Allagans (and this is a important mystery for a couple of different reasons)
2. We don't know if Urth calls on Odin, or if Odin simply comes along, or if he was just looking to support an underdog because it would be a better fight, etc. We don't know the relationship between the two.
3. I would say that your account of how Odin got Zantetsuken is probably accurate, based on what little we know about his trip south.
4. However, the timeline of when Odin became possessed is not clear cut. The Dev's say that he "eventually" succumbs to the influence of the cursed blade. Their wording implies that this could have taken a while. Meaning it's just as likely that he could have been helping Urth for a while before he lost his marbles.
5. With that in mind, we don't know that Odin was the one who killed Urth. The Dev's stated that History is written by the victors. Odin was made out to be the bad guy by the Allagans, and they made it seem like they were the ones on Urth's side. For all we know, the Allagan's may have been the one's to kill Urth (if she is, in fact, dead), possibly even Wiyu himself did the deed, and Odin did not succumb to the sword's influence until after. This would actually make canonical sense if we think about the way influences are handled in the game. Consider that Estinien did not fall prey to Nidhogg's influence until after he let his guard down. He felt like he had finally won. He had a moment of emotional weakness, and boom. Nidhogg reared his ugly mug. The same could have happened to Odin. Upon Urth's death/capture, Odin might have finally snapped and probably killed a lot of people (possibly those "followers" of Urth's that we've heard about) before Wiyu finally sealed the blade.
Here's the exact wording of Fern's post in relation to this:
It states that the Garleans use the term eikon "almost solely in a derogatory fashion" to describe "summons". It states that the Allagans used the term eikon "to describe the powerful summons".
Nowhere, however, does it explicitly state that eikon meant the same thing as primal to the Allagans. There's no explanation provided here of what the difference between "powerful summons" and "summons" is. Could it be as simple as powerful summons just being a subset of summons? Certainly. Could it also be something more than that? Given that we know nothing of the nature of how eikons are summoned (if they are summoned at all) and only some information about the nature of how primals are summoned, it seems folly to simply dismiss the possibility.
It's quite possible for Unukhalai's comments to be true while not contradicting what Fern said.
The problem is that they are fairly nondescript. All Primals are powerful. Leviathan could summon tsunami's that could wipe out Limsa, for example. If we're assuming that the Eikons are, somehow, more powerful than your average summon, than, at most, we're talking about Elder-Primals.
Currently, the only Primals that have been identified as "Elder-Primals" are Alexander, Bahamut, and Odin. From what we know about Elder-Primals it is safe to assume that they are summoned. The Final coil of Bahamut, as well as the brief history we got concerning him in the 3.0 story line, confirms this (as both Bahamut and Alexander have both been confirmed to have been originally summoned, and sustained by the wished of those summons). Odin is the only odd Primal/eikon out in this regard, as, currently, we have no information about who summoned him or why.
Further, the issue is compounded by the fact that we also are now unclear about which part of Odin is the actual summon. Odin has been the one traditionally identified as the Primal; yet, in recent story developments they have referred to the sword, Zantetsuken, as the Primal. Worse yet, the Dev's have only referred to the sword as a "cursed sword," and not a primal at all. It is easiest to simply say that the sword is a Primal, however, if it is, it has no summoner that we know of (unlike it's fellow Elder Primals) and has no distinct persona (as it always fashions a "Odin body" for itself, and the proceeds to speak through that body as if it is Odin, eternally searching for Urth). The original theory was that Odin had somehow put his soul into the sword, but, if the sword is the Primal than I'm not sure how that would be possible (it would almost seem like reverse-tempering O_o).
Odin his story is extremely odd, but thinking on FATE of Odin the one who beats Odin there is a WoD with protection to be tempered and the same comes back as odin on next FATE, in the case isn't the sword manifestating the strongest being that beat it until it reach the peak of its power through selection after being defeated? Where Odin was never really defeated, but it waits until someone even stronger shows up for it becomes stronger and stronger than its prior versions. In this case Odin is merely toying with everyone trying to reach absolute power by being defeated and taking the one that beat him as a idea where he "summons" that person to be his body and carry Zantetsuken again on battlefield.
So in the end... Whats Odin goal for real?
In this interview, Fern said that the difference between a Primal and an Elder Primal is "a matter of length of worship", rather than any measure of how powerful the Primal is. Elder Primals are not intrinsically more or less powerful than Primals.
We've not see the Warring Triad in action (nor do we know in what way the massive statues of them are related, in scale, to the eikons themselves), though we do know (from the Extreme Primal quests) that Ravana and Bismarck would have been eager to tap into their power. It's reasonable to assume, based on the quests, that the Triad are likely substantially more powerful than even the strongest Primals we've encountered so far.
The only entity we've interacted with that we've had confirmed to meet the Allagan definition of an eikon is Zantetsuken/Odin, who happens to also be referred to as an Elder Primal. That also doesn't really tell us how much of an overlap there is between those two terms. We do, however, know that Unukhalai doesn't bring up Bahamut Prime when he's talking about eikons, and Bahamut Prime is referred to as an Elder Primal.
My suspicion would be that all known Eikons would fit the definition of an Elder Primal, but the reverse may not necessarily be true. That is just my suspicion though. Either way, it's hard to infer too much about eikons based on the single data point we have.
We also know from T10 that Bahamut Prime required a massive amount of prayer to sustain his existence. We've had no obvious explanation of who or what is providing the source of belief/prayer for Zantetsuken/Odin, if indeed there is a source at all.
Last edited by Ibi; 09-22-2015 at 03:55 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|