Please add "Encounter-Lock" to Airship content.

[Nektulos-Tuor]

Allow a party leader to add a group option that locks a fight to your party only. This way other players cannot troll you by dragging aggro from your named boss and pulling it away so it leashes.

[Sylve]

If your tank lets a mob run 40+ yards away before realizing he lost enmity ... You need a new Tank.

[AlphaFox]

If your tank lets a mob run 40+ yards away before realizing he lost enmity ... You need a new Tank.

I think he is referring to Provoke more than anything.

[Sylve]

I think he is referring to Provoke more than anything.

All your tank has to do is Provoke it back... Not like its a PLD exclusive skill.
And even without Provoke, just using a Ranged skill on it will bring it back.

[Canadane]

Provoke doesn't work on NMs as it is.
That being said, griefing can be reported to a GM. So if someone does manage to take your mob with the sole intention to reset it, report him for harassment.

[Nektulos-Tuor]

Provoke doesn't work on NMs as it is.
That being said, griefing can be reported to a GM. So if someone does manage to take your mob with the sole intention to reset it, report him for harassment.

No, its a contested zone. That is a valid tactic. So is training on them. Its part of the game. Only thing you can do is lock encounters, which is what EQ did.

The issue is allowing reporting in contested content will spam GMs with harassment reports just because people got there first. They feel entitled that they deserve the loot. Which is why SOE in that time made a policy that players have to govern themselves.

[Nadirah]

No, its a contested zone. That is a valid tactic. So is training on them. Its part of the game. Only thing you can do is lock encounters, which is what EQ did.

The issue is allowing reporting in contested content will spam GMs with harassment reports just because people got there first. They feel entitled that they deserve the loot. Which is why SOE in that time made a policy that players have to govern themselves.

No, it's jackassery, and it's reportable. It's called "Zone Disruption".

This isn't EQ2.

To normal content. Not contested content.

.... Hunts are contested content.

From Terms of Service: (http://support.na.square-enix.com/ru...2&tag=users_en)

3.2 Disruption. You may not in any way disrupt or interfere with the Game experience of other players, including the disruption of Square Enix's computers and servers.

[Velox]

No, its a contested zone. That is a valid tactic. So is training on them. Its part of the game. Only thing you can do is lock encounters, which is what EQ

No, it's not a valid tactic. Purposely resetting a mob, regardless of type, is punishable if someone else is already attacking it.

[Nektulos-Tuor]

No, it's not a valid tactic. Purposely resetting a mob, regardless of type, is punishable if someone else is already attacking it.

To normal content. Not contested content.

[FallenArisen0990]

To normal content. Not contested content.

Doesn't matter. Purposely resetting the mob is against the ToS agreement.