I'll respect that opinion, even though I disagree. Coming from a different aspect of customer service, that of automotive service. The aggressive customers often cost the company more money then they invest. It's on us to remain 'amiable' in order to preserve company reputation in spite of the toxicity of a customer (or in many cases, because of it.) an amiable customer in Automotive can typical have a situation explained to them in a clam manner even when they have a problem and be more easily reclaimed and maintained - which that positive business relationship has those customers return.
Different perspectives from different aspects of service.
As far as this particular juncture, a lot is lost in translation when it comes to discussion on what happened and what is expected. Truth of the matter is, this is nothing new, but it's being presented, argumentatively, as such. We've had delays before, with less reasoning given, with far less offensive reaction on behalf of our consumer base.
But because of a lot of this situation revolves around misinformation (first and foremost that we're getting 'less' this patch than we did in previous patches, basicly listing the 'bredth' of content without any comparison of depth.) people are entering into the situation far more heated and with a severe negative bias. And it is this sort of knee-jerk reaction based off of misconceptions that I find myself heavily flustered at.
Again, this is nothing personal against you. I do disagree with you but I see where you are coming from. I do hope the game becomes more of what you can enjoy soon - but I don't think your removal of your subscription is ultimately productive, in spite of your intention for it to be.
But I don't expect your thresholds, reasoning, or standards to maintain your subscription to be the same as mine, that's just asinine. I just feel differently about the situation.
After looking at the situation, I feel as if I owe you an apology. I was rather rude in my last post and reactive. You seem to at least have a grounds in logic with your stance that has reference points. I don't agree with them, but I can respect them.
I feel, along with others, that this situation isn't as dire or as shady as it's being made out to be. I don't feel the level of dramatic response provided by the prevailing conversation is merited. As I said earlier, people can unsubscribe, no harm, no foul, whenever they please. However the tactic of leaving 'parting shots' (as opposed to trying to provide helpful feedback), or that of empty rage, is not one I encourage. It's not useful in my work industry, and it's a very abrasive social practice to have to bear witness to on a daily basis.
Otherwise, there's no conflict here. Even your feedback that they could have alerted us to the delay sooner is one I agree with.