Quote Originally Posted by Erys View Post
My doubt now is why measure it Ht loops when this creates (in this case) a difference in total gcds and actual time to perform? Wouldn't it be more accurate to use the same amount of gcds?
You have to look at the loop because the way you calculated it, the next 14 gcds would have a different potency for both rotations. Like the double finisher would be C44-TTT44-HT-IDC44, which has significantly higher potency than the first 14.

If you did want to look at it over a set number of gcds you have to find the lowest common multiple of the 2 rotations (in this case 143 gcds)