Results 1 to 10 of 1926

Hybrid View

  1. 01-31-2017 10:09 AM #1
    Wegente
    Player
    Wegente's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    60
    Character
    Wegente Leth
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by aleph_null View Post
    Oh and I forgot to move few points of crit to sks to reach 625 (2.39 gcd), otherwise you end up with 20+ useless sks.
    Quick question since I'm planning to slowly make my relic as well, does that mean that having any more than 625 sks is completely useless if my GCD is 2.39s already?
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-01-2017 06:28 PM #2
    aleph_null
    Player
    aleph_null's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    690
    Character
    Aleph Alpha
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Wegente View Post
    Quick question since I'm planning to slowly make my relic as well, does that mean that having any more than 625 sks is completely useless if my GCD is 2.39s already?
    Some people believe sks reduces gcd in tiers (599 = 2.40, 625 = 2.39), while others believe that every point of sks counts, just the UI won't show the decimals past the hundredths. If the former is true then yes any sks past 625 is wasted until you reach the 2.38 tier (which is 651 iirc).
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-06-2017 12:45 AM #3
    Krindor
    Player
    Krindor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    435
    Character
    U'tyada Tia
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 67
    Quote Originally Posted by aleph_null View Post
    Some people believe sks reduces gcd in tiers (599 = 2.40, 625 = 2.39), while others believe that every point of sks counts, just the UI won't show the decimals past the hundredths. If the former is true then yes any sks past 625 is wasted until you reach the 2.38 tier (which is 651 iirc).
    There's no belief in this theory it's been tested and proven by both me and Dervy that it's tiered.
    (1)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »