Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Sapphidia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    405
    Character
    Sapphidia Wulfhaven
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Ralvenom View Post
    Because those things wouldn't make PLD even more overpowered on defense, right? Oh, wait...
    They would, but people would STILL take DRK/WAR.

    This is the argument that really annoys me on these forums. Everyone worried that boosting a paladin's defensiveness will somehow make them overpowered and invalidate the other tanks. The whole point of the current tanking meta is that all that matters is DPS DPS DPS DPS, because you can acceptably tank Alex Savage in slaying accessories without using a tanking stance on a lot of it.

    Paladins could have -vastly- improved defenses and it wouldn't help their current predicament.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Phoenicia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Idling in Idle-shire
    Posts
    748
    Character
    Naomi Enami
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Sapphidia View Post
    Paladins could have -vastly- improved defenses and it wouldn't help their current predicament.
    Exactly, any buff to paladins' defenses "make no difference" unless they defensiveness absolutely crushes the other tanks. I.e. Tank in sword oath and still take less damage than Grit/Defiance DRK or WAR.

    Paladins' issues do not lie in their defenses (or lack of). Paladins' issues lie in inherent weaknesses that lead to more problems. Their weaker aggro leads to DPS loss. Their weaker DPS leads to unjustifiable increase in mitigation. And so on.

    To "fix" paladins, they need to be either: "Absolute best defenders" so there is no environment where it wouldn't work, or fix their aggro so they can dish out more optimal DPS. Or make them much more viable as off-tanks.
    (1)
    Last edited by Phoenicia; 09-08-2015 at 11:31 PM.