Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 56
  1. #11
    Player
    Sapphidia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    405
    Character
    Sapphidia Wulfhaven
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Nektulos-Tuor View Post
    Increase DPS enough and you will rather take more DPS and have them tank it instead of a tank. Which happened in some MMOs. =)

    Which can happen here.
    I think it was in Aion where the Templar was the designated tank class, but the difference in survivability between a plate clad shield-wearing Templar and a leather clad Assassin dpser was really small. At one point groups just werent taking tanks at all and were relying on Assassins to tank, simply because they did the most damage and it let them push encounter dps much harder.

    As a Templar main, my role was relegated to throwing on a two handed sword, gearing for crit, and being a DPS/offtank whilst the assassins did the maintank job. It wasnt fun.
    (2)

  2. #12
    Player
    Amiaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    403
    Character
    Genevieve Mhakaracca
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Dererk View Post
    Tank hate generation is tied into their dps so higher a tanks dps is better their hate generation is.
    Hmm, not necessarily. Some moves are specifically designed to take enmity, while others are not. Flash does this without doing damage, and can even be used when an enemy is asleep without waking it. Healers can end up tanking on accident without ever attacking an enemy. As you said, enmity and DPS are tied, but they are not the same thing. A tank can (and should) come back with DPS lower than that of an actual DPS because increased enmity generation is already built into some of their moves.

    I think a bigger focus on moves designed to take and hold enmity rather than output DPS as a means of controlling enemies would encourage people to explore alternative builds rather than going for a raw DPS build.
    (1)
    Winter Maintenance is coming

  3. #13
    Player
    Donjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    980
    Character
    A'lyhhia Tahz
    World
    Lamia
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 80
    I personally think that this is a much bigger problem than it sounds. It's the most visible mechanic in a set of systems surrounding Tanking that have coincidentally come together to allow such a bend toward Strength that Tanks can run off and almost completely abandon their assigned role... yet still not die.

    Outcry regarding Tank DPS and the fight against Vitality and Strength has never been so loud as it is now. Even Japanese forumgoers are allegedly questioning why Fending Accessories aren't the best thing a Tank should wear, like every other job's accessories are. Square Enix cannot pretend to be blind to this.

    Going into 3.1, they've claimed to have the data that "Tanks are having trouble securing enmity". It is very possible that they'll just pop in, buff Paladin enmity, and call it a day. It would keep things largely as they are. They could alternately openly buff Paladin DPS somehow. This would prove that the greater community has the ability to bully the developers into abandoning the intended design of a job. A terrible precedent. Finally, they could make a major change to systems that provides a clearer direction for Tanks to go.

    The last thing we probably want, however, is wholesale nerfs to Tank DPS. Stuff like job locking accessories and nothing else. The outcry would get particularly violent if groups who relied on stacking Strength on the Tanks to get through Savage fights suddenly couldn't do so anymore.

    No matter what, I think that we want dev answers to these kinds of questions regarding intent:

    - Do you intend for Tanks to be collecting Slaying Accessories along with Fending?
    - Do you intend for Tanks to be tanking stuff outside of their Tank Stance?

    I would wager to say that most of the confusion around here is due to the fact that the answer to the big question of "What in the name of the Flying Spaghetti Monster are Tanks supposed to be doing!?" is just so... wishy washy. I could appreciate any change they make to this stuff as long as they put their foot on one side of the line and stick with it.
    (5)

  4. #14
    Player
    Wizhard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    239
    Character
    Wizhard Felfury
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Dererk View Post
    Tank hate generation is tied into their dps so higher a tanks dps is better their hate generation is.
    Actually, maximising your dps as a paladin means doing less enmity than some of the dps classes.
    (0)

  5. #15
    Player
    SeraviEdalborez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,558
    Character
    Seravi Edalborez
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Donjo View Post
    I personally think that this is a much bigger problem than it sounds. It's the most visible mechanic in a set of systems surrounding Tanking that have coincidentally come together to allow such a bend toward Strength that Tanks can run off and almost completely abandon their assigned role... yet still not die.

    Outcry regarding Tank DPS and the fight against Vitality and Strength has never been so loud as it is now. Even Japanese forumgoers are allegedly questioning why Fending Accessories aren't the best thing a Tank should wear, like every other job's accessories are. Square Enix cannot pretend to be blind to this.

    Going into 3.1, they've claimed to have the data that "Tanks are having trouble securing enmity". It is very possible that they'll just pop in, buff Paladin enmity, and call it a day. It would keep things largely as they are. They could alternately openly buff Paladin DPS somehow. This would prove that the greater community has the ability to bully the developers into abandoning the intended design of a job. A terrible precedent. Finally, they could make a major change to systems that provides a clearer direction for Tanks to go.

    The last thing we probably want, however, is wholesale nerfs to Tank DPS. Stuff like job locking accessories and nothing else. The outcry would get particularly violent if groups who relied on stacking Strength on the Tanks to get through Savage fights suddenly couldn't do so anymore.

    No matter what, I think that we want dev answers to these kinds of questions regarding intent:

    - Do you intend for Tanks to be collecting Slaying Accessories along with Fending?
    - Do you intend for Tanks to be tanking stuff outside of their Tank Stance?

    I would wager to say that most of the confusion around here is due to the fact that the answer to the big question of "What in the name of the Flying Spaghetti Monster are Tanks supposed to be doing!?" is just so... wishy washy. I could appreciate any change they make to this stuff as long as they put their foot on one side of the line and stick with it.
    It doesn't really matter what the dev team intends. It matters what they allow because this is what sets the limit for how players shape the meta. And they have allowed STR or meldaccessory meta for a long time now. They purposely delay implementing crafted accessories for the sole purpose of trying to curb it, but the reality is that they can't stop it from being optimal because "too much VIT" is a ridiculously easy threshold to pass and even 2-patches-old accessory melds are better than current tier blue accessories for tanks.

    When i150 melded accessories beat, in terms of combined STR, VIT, and secondaries, a mix of Slay/Fend all the way up to a theoretical 220, you have a problem with the already problematically simple vertical gear design. It's not just optimal in terms of stats, it's also optimal in terms of the most valuable commodity in the game: time. Specifically the weekly lockout. You skip having to buy 5 Esoteric accessories or having to get 5 Alex Savage accessories, meaning you can allot Esoterics to other slots or jobs sooner or not have to roll against another player for loot. And it's the best option on top of that.

    The issue of Slaying vs Fending accessories is subjective as fuck, but melded accessories are where the real problem lies. Not in that they exist, but in that they are the unequivocally best option for multiple reasons. And this is somehow treated as a bad thing. When you lower the bar enough for a poor-quality player to be able to clear most content, you allow for a larger percentage of the playerbase to successfully perform things as arbitrarily simple as tanking without tank stance. If you make it hard enough to always warrant the tank stance, you exclude more of the precious casual customers who couldn't handle it with tank stance beforehand.

    The STR meta is not going to disappear. Ever. As long as the game continues to revolve around tight DPS checks. Even if it someday does not, I would have a hard time believing nobody wants to clear a fight faster. Marginally or not.

    It doesn't wholly matter what tanks "do" in any other MMO before or alongside this. In this game, DPS is an expectation because the whole game revolves around it. It doesn't even take any special effort for tanks in this game, yet people treat it like it's the most difficult thing in the world for the easiest role in the world.
    (2)
    Last edited by SeraviEdalborez; 09-07-2015 at 10:34 AM.

  6. #16
    Player
    Litegrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    50
    Character
    Lite Avalon
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 62
    I honestly just think they need to adjust fending gear. Adding any kind of damage mitigation or a slight healing buff to it would be great, or even a fraction of STR added on top of the VIT would be welcome. I'm all for the option of still choosing slaying accessories to maximize DPS (especially as an OT), but as of right now fending accessories aren't even an option in end game content (which is the main issue).

    I personally hate the idea of spending millions on low level pentamelds, and I dislike mixing and matching accessories (bugs me if they don't match). I like the concept of pentamelds (getting a good mix of both stats, while not having the best of either), but right now it just blows the i210 accessories out of the water entirely. At this point, as much as I like the idea of adding damage resistance or a healing buff to fending accessories, we would basically just need STR added to them. With how strict dps checks are now, STR is almost mandatory to clear content.
    (2)

  7. #17
    Player
    Donjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    980
    Character
    A'lyhhia Tahz
    World
    Lamia
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Litegrace View Post
    What to do with accessories...
    Yep, there are options. I've seen people liken seeing a Fending Accessory drop from A1 to not getting a chest at all. It's just awful. Let us support a future where a Tank can look upon a Fending Accessory shining in a chest with a smile and say "Yes! An upgrade!"... because that just isn't happening right now in this world of Slaying and Pentamelds.
    (7)

  8. #18
    Player
    Litegrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    50
    Character
    Lite Avalon
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 62
    Quote Originally Posted by Donjo View Post
    Yep, there are options. I've seen people liken seeing a Fending Accessory drop from A1 to not getting a chest at all. It's just awful. Let us support a future where a Tank can look upon a Fending Accessory shining in a chest with a smile and say "Yes! An upgrade!"... because that just isn't happening right now in this world of Slaying and Pentamelds.
    This exactly. I'm not saying that I know exactly what to do with fending gear, I just know that something needs to be done. As much as I would love to see some sort of damage resistance or healing buff built into it (to increase tankiness), I realize that STR would benefit the meta more. I just want tank gear, I don't want to spend millions in the market on i150 or have to compete with dps for STR gear.
    (4)

  9. #19
    Player
    AnimaS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    215
    Character
    Anima Soulcleanser
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 60
    We (Warriors) also generate emnity with our highest potency combo...... war was clearly designed to stand apart from PLD initially, and the developers took time to evolve....... however the vitality accessory and "Fending" are flat out wrong and of course lead one to believe this is what they are supposed to have on despite the obvious from veterans....... Warrior is unique but there were only 2 tanks till now... is there a solution? not really lest they put the materia marketout of business.....
    (0)

  10. #20
    Player
    AnimaS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    215
    Character
    Anima Soulcleanser
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 60
    dps checks are not a solution , nor are harder tank busters for warrior. what is a hard tank buster? how about 70,000 damage? oh we killed that in T10 with holmgang. Redefining accessories is possible but they cannot hand out gear with str and vit on them.......... provide a meld slot for tanks to put strength (job specIFiC) ?
    (0)

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast