It buffs the damage thus buffing the emenity.Will have longer cooldown but be a more effective skill inbetween flash.In the long run would be a better threat holder for blm nukes or summoners
It buffs the damage thus buffing the emenity.Will have longer cooldown but be a more effective skill inbetween flash.In the long run would be a better threat holder for blm nukes or summoners

It nerfs the damage though because you are trading 1100 for 600 due to the fact you can cast it twice for every once with your change.
There is only 10 seconds down time with the 25 CD when you don't have the DoT up as it stands.
Your change would mean there is 25 second of nothing after the DoT falls off.
So if anything the longer the fight went on the worse off you'd be.
I also misread your fell cleave change due to not having the original potency on hand and how you had laid out the other changes but it seems like a unnecessary change.
Also my math is bad because I don't do damage calculations ;-; so Pooky down there V probably explains it better!
Last edited by PotatoWafflez; 09-06-2015 at 10:56 AM.
Yeah i forgot to add about the DOT.i'd change it to 40 potency over 30 seconds.

You actually just nerfed Circle of Scorn by 25%. Right now it's 250 pot/25 sec = 10 pot/sec. Yours is 300 pot/40 sec = 7.5 pot/sec. (10 - 7.5) / 10 = .25 = 25%. And that is BEFORE you factor in Flight or Fight, which can buff 2 out of 4 CoS right now. You nerfed it pretty bad.
Also, people should stop underestimating Sword Oath. It is a roughly +12% damage from neutral stance (not in sword or shield oath). It really is incredibly powerful for being persistent.
Last edited by Pooky_Pasha; 09-06-2015 at 10:58 AM.
What get your facts straight Dark mind costs no mp to use you only use mp on it when you use Dark Arts and DA costs the same for every thing.
And you forgot to add this nerf to your WAR.
Put WARs tank and dps stance on the GCD and add a 777 mp cost to each. And add instant hp to tank stance war who has full hp before stance.
Last edited by Dererk; 09-06-2015 at 12:23 PM.

WAR is not overpowered. WAR does not need a nerf, there is nothing broken about a tank that can sustain itself and put out good DPS when played correctly.
The other tanks are just (comparatively) weak and need buffs.

This is not even good balance. I don't mean to bash you, but this post just shows what ignorance you have about the other classes, namely the Dark Mind nerf you suggested. Why is this even suggested? Because they are good in Alexander Savage? Do you realize that Dark Knight is actually a terribly designed class. It's kit is entirely disjointed, but SE ensured that it wouldn't suck by making all of the hardest hitting moves in Alexander magic based, which ended up giving them a significant edge over PLD in terms of MT for Alex. Put DRK in a set of turns where all the damage is physical and you'll see how poorly designed the class is. It's already evident, by the fact that most groups prefer PLD/WAR to DRK/WAR for A2S. Do you realize that 2 of their mitigation abilities aren't even functional in raid content? Dark Arts Dark Dance and Dark Arts Dark Passenger are entirely worthless for anything that isn't a dungeon, aside from adding a little extra damage onto DP when killing adds in A2S. Furthermore, for a Tank that specializes in tanking magic damage, don't you find it odd that one of their mitigation tools is gated by a parry?
Warrior on the other hand is in a good spot, but it's not because Warrior is broken per se. I am of the opinion that Warrior is the epitome of a perfectly designed tank. Their skills make sense, and their ability to stance dance with ease allows their kit to be so fluid. What do your nerfs to Fell Cleave and Decimate serve to do by making them barely better than their Defiance respective counterparts Inner Beast and Steel Cyclone? Warrior does a lot of damage, but it comes at the cost of tanking more damage than either of either of the other tanks. Just ask any healer they'll tell you. My static healers have a significant better experience healing me as the DRK than they do our WAR because there is less spiking involved. There is a trade off for the damage they do. It just seems like a pointless nerf to be honest. The only reason WAR is as good as it is right now is due to the fact that there is no possible contender for the OT spot. The amount of utility a WAR can provide from Storm's Eye and Storm's Path is insane and is the predominant reason for its dominance. No other tank has that sort of raid utility. It's strong, but I think the illusion of it being over powered is due to the fact that DRK was never designed to be an OT so WAR remains uncontested as an OT. If SE wanted to make DRK function better as an OT they'd have to give it utility for it to be worth taking over WAR.
PLD on the other hand wouldn't really benefit from crit in any way shape or form. I don't understand why this change was suggested. As for the Sentinel change, are you just trying to homogenize this ability to make it more like Vengeance? PLD has enough mitigation available that they don't need another mitigation spell to be up that frequently. I don't understand the CoS changes either. You added 50 potency to the base hit of a DoT and want to increase the CD by 15 seconds? Also your Shield Bash change makes no sense either. What is the logic behind it? IMO it should be made into an oGCD, but that would further homogenize the tanking classes.
If you're going to suggest changes like this, present your logic behind it. As of right now you make zero points with regards to "Tank Balance" and contribute nothing at all to the concept of balance. This offers no productive feedback and would not garner the attention of any developers for suggestions.


After reading this OP I'm glad that forum posters are not in charge of job changes.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


