Then prove it wrong.
You'll have to start by proving that all these people in this thread and others that complain that they have to bite their tongue instead of calling people out on their low DPS because it's specifically against the rules to say you're parsing won't, in fact, call people out on their low DPS if it's suddenly not against the rules to be parsing.
Good luck.
Prove it to be wrong.stating things that are simply not true.
Since you seem to think your argument is grounded in truth and evidence, which by the way it's not, prove that the potential for people to get better will objectively outweigh any negatives caused by an increase in harassment reports, including, but not limited to, time spent by GMs on reading and responding to tickets, money spent on extra GM time (or extra GMs if it's a significant increase), increased response times on tickets because of extra tickets, loss of revenue from people banned if they are found to be harassing, and potential loss of revenue from people who get harassed and think that the game is going down the crapper because it's not as fun any more.Are there people who would harass others because of parsers? Yes, definitely
Good luck.
Bear in mind that any benefits that a parser will bring are entirely subjective and not proven at all. Whether a player gets better with a parser is up to them, not the parser. People can still not care. A parser is not required to enjoy the game, as many console players enjoy the game and it's impossible for them to parse, and many PC players enjoy the game who do not parse. Since a parser is not required to enjoy the game, all benefits are subjective. So your job is to prove that subjective opinions are worth more than tangible costs in time and money if there is an increase in harassment.
So you're obviously choosing to ignore the multiple people who have flat out said that they totally would call out people on DPS if it wasn't bannable to even mention that they're parsing.There hasn't been a single case of people actually proving that parsers actually make player harassment worse.
Which are entirely subjective. There are also various arguments that parsing and players trying to enforce some subjective standard does increase harassment. Confirmation bias doesn't make your link automatically true.In fact there are various arguments that show that this just isn't the case.
What's your point? Your limited scope is irrelevant, as is it situationally useless as evidence. A lot of people in this thread alone and in other places have stated that they simply DO care about crappy DPS no matter where they are. They just can't say anything about it right now.Most good players that I know, and this has been backed up by other players experience, simply do not care about crappy DPS unless they are in a challenging raid.
If you tell some random that you're parsing now and they're too low, you can be banned for it if they report you because third party programs. You'd have to be either naive or willfully ignorant to think that this doesn't skew the current situation towards people not saying anything about low parses and just dealing with it, because they can be punished for saying anything about it right now. Remove that restriction because it's no longer third party and I can guarantee it'll go up.
I know.If you're running a simple dungeon like say... Nevereapp then there is no point in stressing over DPS numbers because it's going to be cleared anyway.
Tell that to people like that.
Maybe you're choosing to ignore people like that because you think they're in the minority, and maybe they are, but that's a perfect example of the kind of person that the people you attack for being "fear mongers" are wanting to avoid. Which means you're factually incorrect by saying that it's not true at all.
Which I've already said earlier in the thread I agree with. Really, like 99% of the people trying to argue with me could save everyone's time and space on the forum by just going back and reading what I've actually said and what my actual positions are.If you are in an Extreme encounter or Savage then people have every darn right to complain about underperfoming party members because if they can't take criticism then they should not be in raids at all.
No I'm not. I've said repeatedly that I'm a tank main, not a DPS, so I'm not as concerned with my DPS as I am with staying alive.All you are saying is, "I'm scared someone out there will be mean to me" or blatant exaggerations like, "everyone will suddenly turn into assholes if parsers are available".
I've also never made any exaggerations about "everybody" turning into assholes, except one time where I explicitly stated I was using it as an example of a ridiculous exaggeration.
Even if I had said those, which I haven't, that still wouldn't be ALL I'm saying, because I also brought up a potential increase in harassment reports, whether actionable or not, which costs SE time and money for their GMs, AND brought up console limitations that have to be kept in mind, which you just completely ignored. Which isn't a surprise, because a lot of the pro-parsers somehow completely forget that due to alleged console limitations, we didn't have TP bars for a long time, yet somehow think a full parser with detailed information and a consistent overlay to be able to see data in real time is just easily added in.
If you bothered to take the time to actually look for my solution, it's actually the opposite of what you're claiming.So your solution? Keep people as ignorant as possible? Screw the PS4 players who can't parse themselves?
In fact, if you had bothered to read the post you replied to, you would have read me saying:
To restate my point for 99 millionth time even though I doubt you'll even read this post because you certainly didn't read my previous one, my position is that the optimal compromise is a personal parser with optional sharing. Personal by default for times when people DON'T need to see your parse (duty finder, roulettes), and optional sharing for when they DO (raids, Extreme trials).
But for some reason, some people are dead set against that because they want to see the parse at all times for some reason, even though you assert that people don't care about DPS outside of raids.
Prove it won't worsen it. I'll help you out. You can't. No matter how much you state that it won't worsen it and no matter how many arguments you drag up from other places, you cannot prove it without putting parsers in because anything less is speculation. Speculation that's generally stated by people who want parsers, so one could argue a bias.Parsers will not fix the problems with the community nor will it worsen it
Prove it. I'll tell you to do this every time you make the claim. You have no more evidence that it will help the community and not negatively affect the community than I have to the opposite.Parsers will do way more good for the community than bad by a very large margin
None that you'll read or admit to, anyways.and there is not a single justifiable reason we shouldn't have them.
Feel free to debunk the console limitations one, though, since you think that it's not a justifiable reason.
It's been stated repeatedly throughout the thread. And I do mean repeatedly, because you people don't seem to like to catch up on an argument before jumping into it.I'm also curious as to what you mean by "limited" parsing because that sure doesn’t seem to make much sense.
Edit: I'll also point out that while having a parser may have the potential to make someone improve, it also has the potential to make someone worse through tunnel vision. People standing in AOEs or ignoring adds simply because it'd cause their DPS to drop can cause a wipe just as much as someone having low DPS to start with. Things like this didn't become a comic because of a single isolated incident that happened to one raid ever.
It can be especially bad for people who you think SHOULD get it to improve. If someone's getting called out repeatedly for low DPS and they don't like it, do you think they're going to be the first to willingly jump over and do some mechanics or get out of AOEs that they could totally survive and just make the healers cast an extra heal on them when it's going to make their DPS drop a bit? DFing Alexander floor 1 can be annoying enough with multiple DPS that just leave the adds for someone else to handle while they continue shooting Oppressor... until the group wipes because nobody killed an add under a nuke.


Reply With Quote

