
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.He may be done, but he did disprove the whole argument of "harassment potential Square-Enix thinks". So he at least deserves some commendation for looking up a source, even if it's a bit old. So with my previous post: It's false as proven by Malevicton's post.
Those two sources do not prove a negative, they just don't prove a positive.
And that's all that really needs be said on that subject. I already admitted that I don't have any sources available.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

