The Real Problem with Parsers

[Malevicton]

I edited some sources into my last post, btw.

[Aiselia]

It's false unless proven otherwise.

Fine, whatever you want. It still has no bearing on my personal position, so it doesn't really matter to me. Congratulations for being the first person in 45 pages to even think outside the box, though.

I edited some sources into my last post, btw.

Yeah, but you're done.

[Lyrica_Ashtine]

Yeah, but you're done.

He may be done, but he did disprove the whole argument of "harassment potential Square-Enix thinks". So he at least deserves some commendation for looking up a source, even if it's a bit old. So with my previous post: It's false as proven by Malevicton's post.

[Aiselia]

He may be done, but he did disprove the whole argument of "harassment potential Square-Enix thinks". So he at least deserves some commendation for looking up a source, even if it's a bit old. So with my previous post: It's false as proven by Malevicton's post.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Those two sources do not prove a negative, they just don't prove a positive.

And that's all that really needs be said on that subject. I already admitted that I don't have any sources available.

[Whiteroom]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Those two sources do not prove a negative, they just don't prove a positive.

And that's all that really needs be said on that subject. I already admitted that I don't have any sources available.

But given that you made the claim, the onus is on you to prove it. You can't make a claim up and then say others have to disprove it. Even when faced with evidence to the contrary, you are still clutching at it.

You know what, I heard somewhere that parsers make everyone super friendly and they hug after clearing content, and flowers grow where the boss died. At least thats what SE believes, or so I think I may have read somewhere. I can't provide the source, but now it must be considered while discussing parsers, since it can't be disproven.