Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post
Actually, it is, if you're not trying to argue semantics.

I didn't make the claim. I followed a claim other people made. I already said I don't have official sources.

I didn't say they had to disprove it. I said that what he posted doesn't prove it wrong just because it doesn't mention it.

I'm not clutching at anything. I already said that what their stance is is irrelevant to my own position so I don't really care.
If their stance is irrelevant, why use it in the first place. Or is it only relevant if it supports your argument?

So, about the whole jerks thing, there is almost nothing that can be implimented in game that cant be used by jerks in an abusive fashion. Emotes, vote kick/dismiss, not being able to kick during loot rolls/battle, etc. And guess what, all that can be abused in the opposite way if not implimented, same with parsers.

So, given that almost anything put in the game can be abused, should they stop adding things? Also does the parser actually create jerks? Or are the people already jerks, abusing something in game. If you can write a program that actually changes people into jerks from nice people, that is a powerful program.