Quote Originally Posted by Malevicton View Post
Well that's the most arrogant thing I've read today.
If you choose to take it that way, that's your prerogative. I, however, was asking a serious question.

What part of it deserved a response?

Where he said "These are the stupidest threads ever", suggesting a preformed bias against threads against parsers?
Where he admitted he only got up to 15 pages before "summing it up"?
Where he just made a biased strawman "summary" based on his own self-admitted lack of knowledge of what the thread actually contains because he didn't read it all?

Which of those parts deserved a response? Which of those should I respond to that I shouldn't expect should just be a giant waste of my time because he likely won't bother reading it fairly?