Quote Originally Posted by Aiselia View Post


So really, if anyone's arguing for the sake of arguing, it's the people who obstinately just put forth arguments like "Jerks will be jerks, gimme parser" or "Getting kicked builds character, git gud, gimme parser". I, on the other hand, have actually put some effort into considering ways parsers could be added for the sake of everybody without stepping on peoples' toes.
Actually, the jerks gonna be jerks is simply stating that claiming parsers create jerks is a fallacy. The jerks are already there, being jerks, the only thing parsers bring is that they can say a number when they are being jerks.... But most people understand that much anyway.


Also, lol, you put forth effort and "considered" personal parsers. Wow. Who, that has put more than a couple minutes of thought into parsers, has not thought of personal ones.

They usually come to the correct conclusion, that they are nothing more than a half measure that is largely useless. A number with out something to compare it to, means nothing. Oh, you thought they could come to forums to find out... if they don't come to read up on proper rotations already, they aren't coming for a number that means nothing to them. Oh, they could share? Lets look at that, why would they, what do they gain. Then, as you obviously haven't considered, according to your parsers will make everyone jerkfaces logic, people who wouldn't share would be kicked as they would be deemed to be hiding bad numbers.

They also don't allow you to diagnose potential problem areas in a run.

Personal parsers are a huge half measure. So please don't claim some "I, on the other hand put deep thought into this" status.

And yes, I skip through most of your posts, you used disabled people as a defense against parsers.... come on, of course I skip through most of it after that.