Extending usage of macros

[Sida]

If you can't craft something on 15 steps, then you shouldn't be automating it anyway. Specifically because there is the ability to use <wait> there needs to be a limit on the actions used. And especially the ability to use one macro from another is absolutely out of question as it opens the gate for infinite loop. And that would open all sorts of cans of worms. Yes, the limit could be slightly bigger than it is now, it just happens to be 15, but infinite, nnope.

[StouterTaru]

If you can't craft something on 15 steps, then you shouldn't be automating it anyway. Specifically because there is the ability to use <wait> there needs to be a limit on the actions used. And especially the ability to use one macro from another is absolutely out of question as it opens the gate for infinite loop. And that would open all sorts of cans of worms. Yes, the limit could be slightly bigger than it is now, it just happens to be 15, but infinite, nnope.

You can't currently start a synth with an in game macro, so infinite lines isn't an issue.

[Sida]

You can't currently start a synth with an in game macro, so infinite lines isn't an issue.

Your suggestion would make it possible to make infinite macros, regardless what you use them for. Such loopholes don't belong to a macro interface.

[Laraul]

Sida... the only loopholes I see is in your arguments...