Why keep DF off of new content?

[Arashmin]

@Evangela: Not much of a reason though. I'd rather do things in vain than do nothing at all. Plus, it means you can learn up and experience it, so even if you don't clear at least you're taking in something.

[JohnMccain]

@Evangela: Not much of a reason though. I'd rather do things in vain than do nothing at all. Plus, it means you can learn up and experience it, so even if you don't clear at least you're taking in something.

There is not much you can learn and experience with Faust.

[Ibi]

@Evangela: Not much of a reason though. I'd rather do things in vain than do nothing at all. Plus, it means you can learn up and experience it, so even if you don't clear at least you're taking in something.

That's the reason though. You may not like it or agree with it, but that's why they've done it.

I do believe they phrased it slightly differently. Something to the effect of not wanting people to accidentally find themselves in way over their heads or completely unprepared, and getting overly frustrated because they didn't realize what they'd be up against.

Where do people get the idea that any DF party is made up of the worst players in the game, while a PF group of randoms (same as DF) is any better?

The most significant difference is that you can guarantee a composition in PF.

How well do you think a DF group with 2 pld tanks or with no brd/mch would fare in Alexander Savage?