Results 1 to 10 of 103

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player MilesSaintboroguh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    5,764
    Character
    Miles Saintborough
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    I don't see a point for an ascian to possess a dead body unless they seriously ran out of ideas. Death of a character should be a serious thing and stay dead, not a cheap drama card to pull out of your butt for drama's sake.
    (2)

  2. #2
    Player
    Ayuhra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Palace of the Dead
    Posts
    1,483
    Character
    Ayuh'ra Bajhiri
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Dancer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by MilesSaintboroguh View Post
    I don't see a point for an ascian to possess a dead body unless they seriously ran out of ideas.
    As of the Summoner quests Ascians possessing corpses IS a thing, to be fair. Weaker Ascians (ie Ascian of the Twelfth Chalice etc) don't have the strength to take on still living hosts.

    Thus do I pose the question: could it be that the Twelfth Chalice and his black-masked brethren are not as practiced in the art of possession as their red-veiled masters? At the time of the battle, our bodies were the only available hosts nearby. Assuming that he also lacks his superiors' facility to flee to the space betwixt worlds, I suspect that our foe's sudden cowardice stemmed from an inability to force his soul into our living vessels.
    Twelfth Chalice had been using a certain dead NPC as a puppet.

    Not saying an Ascian will possess Haurchefant but if they wanted to play that card, they have a set up for it.
    (1)
    Last edited by Ayuhra; 09-03-2015 at 12:06 PM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Fenral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,175
    Character
    W'fharl Tia
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Viper Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by MilesSaintboroguh View Post
    His death is more powerful because it's someone you will never get back.
    Quote Originally Posted by MilesSaintboroguh View Post
    Death of a character should be a serious thing and stay dead, not a cheap drama card to pull out of your butt for drama's sake.
    Yeah, but as it stands now, most "costs" we've paid have been human lives, but nonetheless handled like one-time charges to our bank account to be made and then forgotten. If death is supposed to be meaningful, then death should matter. Death by itself is not meaningful. When a meaningful death occurs, the story is forced to change in order to account for the loss of one of its players, and that change in course is then felt by the characters that remain, even, rather, especially when the lasting implications aren't immediately apparent.

    Lots of people made George R. R. Martin comparisons to FFXIV's handling of characters since 2.5, but the fact of the matter is, the (surviving) characters in A Song of Ice and Fire are still feeling the effects of certain deaths from as early as book one, and the places where even a minor character's death becomes important after the fact are almost as dramatic as the deaths themselves.

    Getting possessed by an Ascian or getting turned into a primal would both be story-altering consequences to a death that has so far served no purpose besides being a "meaningful cost" with no consequence beyond "waah, Haurchefant's dead." (That sounds sarcastic, but I'm crying, too.)
    (10)
    あっきれた。