Not all of my suggestions are based on the here and now situation and state of the game, months/years down the line a LS leader might say goodbye to his long time LS and the members want to continue, instead of remaking and such he could pass lead to one of his second in commands.
Not every linkshell is tight knit like that so using your own LS as an example is not going debunk the suggestion or make it lose merit. My LS is a bunch of nice, cool, mature and chill people with a few bad apples who ofcourse ragequit the game. Now when I check my LS list I have to scroll through 10+ ppl just to see a few ppl that are online.
Same concept in XI, the elitest only want you to have one shell, but you have friends with social shells or random shells just for the lulz with a name you just can't help but join. I am in favor of the latter, I have plenty of friends in XIV that has been growing since closed beta, I currently run my shell and I have pearl to my friend's LS and they have one to mine. Loyalty has nothing to do with this as I am not a douche and i don't condone any douche-baggery in my LS so if we do take part in end-game activities and they tell me another shell they are in is going to kill xyz NM and suggests we beat them to it, he'll find himself 1 less linkshell on his person.
These suggestions are for your average joe LSs and are only intended to help even without a way to communicate with multiple LSs people will still have more then one on them unless SE removes that feature. If you are having any lag issues with the game as it is now I would suggest a small upgrade instead of downing suggestions that wouldn't even add any stress on the network or computer no more then a 8year+ old game did back then.




Reply With Quote



