Results 1 to 10 of 47

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Mclyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    239
    Character
    Ingrid Krimhilde
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 60
    I don't understand why you don't even talk about removing those 96 players match and improve 8vs8 or 8vs8vs8.
    8vs8 is the best formula since it lets express the very own skills of the players. And the queue's time would logicaly decrease a lot.
    Let's have more 4vs4 arena too.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    Turin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    98
    Character
    Hunter Aldebaran
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Mclyde View Post
    I don't understand why you don't even talk about removing those 96 players match and improve 8vs8 or 8vs8vs8.
    8vs8 is the best formula since it lets express the very own skills of the players. And the queue's time would logicaly decrease a lot.
    Let's have more 4vs4 arena too.
    I made another thread a week or two ago discussing how we need some smaller objective based matches. In the last paragraph, I do mention "providing a smaller scale map for two GCs (or GC agnostic - flames can battle other flames)" which I meant something like a 8v8.


    I guess the big question is, how do they keep 72 player matches relevant if they add a smaller scale map? Then again, if queues are quicker and more reliable, I think more people would continue to requeue.
    (0)
    Last edited by Turin; 08-17-2015 at 04:55 AM.