Why refusing customization is a fallacy

[Sandpark]

I think what he is meaning by DPS check is that it don't matter if you wear I90 or I300. If you can't play jump rope or rotate your skills right. You still suck and can wipe. Or you can be an i90 player and be better than an I300 player.

[Reynhart]

I think what he is meaning by DPS check is that it don't matter if you wear I90 or I300. If you can't play jump rope or rotate your skills right. You still suck and can wipe. Or you can be an i90 player and be better than an I300 player.

At last someone who understand, thank you very much.

You know, that's the reason why only Arcanist branches into 2 jobs, the development team realized it was a pain in the ass to balance both SCH and SMN because they shared most of their abilities.

Hmm, no it's because they needed a last minute healer

I swap around to whichever tank my group needs for best performance per fight in Savage? It's terrible, but oh well the price you pay for raiding in an unbalanced game.

You also play the jobs you like and not what the community say is "best"

And, just to be clear if I write "best" (with quotation mark) it's exactly because people CLAIMS that this is the "best", even though a lot of people beg to differ.

Because I clearly think this answer :

That's soooo stupid. It's not a choice then. It becomes mandatory to have this build or you're getting the boot.

took my "best" build litterally...

[Instrumentality]

You also play the jobs you like and not what the community say is "best"

I'm not sure I like any of the tank jobs currently. Dark Knight has a lot of weird design choices that make me question how much thought was put into it, Paladin is still the typical sword and board 'tanky' tank (snooze mode), and Warrior getting a dps stance and encouraging role segregation for jobs is pretty up there on the 'meh' scale.

I do, however, like tanking so it's whatever I have to play to get the job done for best performance in group.