I think we need a better reason than "just cause".
I think we need a better reason than "just cause".
For the price, it should have a special ability plus flight. Without those, I'd stick with a regular Direwolf when I want to ride a wolf. (Not that I have anywhere near the MGP to get Fenrir anyway, even if I wanted to.)



Well, sure, then, by that logic, I should be able to kill all the primals (Extreme included) and all main story bosses too with one single, simple /poke. Because why not, it's fantasy.I think that people forget that this game is called Final FANTASY. The reason needed for anything to fly is - just because.
Seriously, sometimes lore is taken to ludicrous conclusions by both players and developers when in reality the whole game is in a fantasy world full of magic. If broomsticks can talk and move then a Wolf can sure as heck fly!
...
Yeah, fantasy doesn't mean we should abandon all sense.
On that note though, I do agree that lore is handled with a bit of a double standard... some things (looking at you, Frontline GC restrictions) are a big no-no in any way, shape, or form, "because lore!"... While for some others, the lore seems to be completely swept under the rug - hello all the primal ponies and other horse mounts, in a land where horses are commonly rather unheard of than seem roaming about (don't remember exactly anymore, but I did count once, and it was like...about double the amount of horse mounts than chocobos? something like that).......
Nah. It's a world of its own, that follows its own logic. This logic needs to stay coherent within itself, or otherwise the world loses it's credibility. A good fantasy world has a logical foundation that stays true to itself. When the world breaks its own logic, it's what's called a plot hole.



In that case the simple answer is that Matoya used her magic and now Fenrir can fly. She did this because your character asked her to. She can make frogs sentient and work for her so a flying Wolf is no problem.Nah. It's a world of its own, that follows its own logic. This logic needs to stay coherent within itself, or otherwise the world loses it's credibility. A good fantasy world has a logical foundation that stays true to itself. When the world breaks its own logic, it's what's called a plot hole.
I wasn't saying this as a reply to how Fenrir shouldn't fly, I was just saying my view on the "it's fantasy so anything goes" argument. I actually want a flying Fenrir too![]()



I didn't mean to come across as being rude, I just wanted to give an easy way to keep it all legit within lore and suchlike. I don't have Fenrir but there's no reason it shouldn't fly. In fact, most mounts should unless they keep it 'realistic', in which case a lot of people will be disappointed at some point. XD
Id be happy if my fenrir just played the snowcloak music when im on it. Lunar cry action wud be cool too
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote







