Machinist Autoturret not receiving the trait Increased Action Damage II

[Haxetc]

Hello, I've been doing multiple tests on MCH and have come to realize that the autoturrets are not receiving the 20% damage increase from the Machinist trait: Increased Action Damage II. The trait states: Increases base action damage and autoturret damage by 20%.

Character Name:
Hax Etc

Race:
Au Ra, but have had multiple others in my FC test it

World:
Excalibur

Class/Level:
Machinist/60



Party or Solo:
Have tested in and out of party

Monster Name:
Old World Striking Dummy

Steps:
How I tested this:

Placed my Rook Autoturret and used Reload adding 20 potency to my WS'. I then Hypercharged making my Split Shot and the Rook's Charged Volley shot deal 160 potency each. The difference in damage is exactly 20% in favor of the Split Shot which would make the Trait incorrect. I did the same with the Bishop Autoturret but using a non proc Clean Shot with the same results. You can do the testing yourself but if this is a bug, MCH have been missing the 20% buff to their autoturret this whole time. Dev please respond.

[Nosiahk]

I agree,

[Greywolfamakir]

When You are turning potency to Damage, Pets are not using the same filter, I mean:

Turrent : X potency
MCH: Y Potency

X==Y does not mean Damage(X)==Damage (Y).

SMN has a trait like MCH, +30% damage actions and pet, and it happens the same, 100 potency from pet is not turned to the same amount of damage than 100 potency SMN spell damage.

[Bitte]

When You are turning potency to Damage, Pets are not using the same filter, I mean:

Turrent : X potency
MCH: Y Potency

X==Y does not mean Damage(X)==Damage (Y) ? .

SMN has a trait like MCH, +30% damage actions and pet, and it happens the same, 100 potency from pet is not turned to the same amount ofdamage than 100 potency SMN spell damage.

Exactly. 300 potency heal from Eos =/= 300 potency heal from me.

[Mishayangg]

Many things about the new classes imply that they are made for lvl 60 and then scaled down after development was done. The reply, if any, you will get from developers is that prior to getting this trait, the turret will receive this bonus.

[Haxetc]

When You are turning potency to Damage, Pets are not using the same filter, I mean:

Turrent : X potency
MCH: Y Potency

X==Y does not mean Damage(X)==Damage (Y) ? .

SMN has a trait like MCH, +30% damage actions and pet, and it happens the same, 100 potency from pet is not turned to the same amount ofdamage than 100 potency SMN spell damage.

Regardless of how a SMN's pet has dealt damage. The fact that the damage difference is exactly 20% which is what the trait is, is why I bring this up. I'm not saying that this is 100% correct. I'm posting this as this doesn't seem right and that if pet potency for the Rook/Bishop autoturret says "Potency: blah" like the owners does it should be equated in the same manner. If it's calculated differently the tooltip should say something like "Pet Potency: blah".

[Bitte]

Regardless of how a SMN's pet has dealt damage. The fact that the damage difference is exactly 20% which is what the trait is, is why I bring this up. I'm not saying that this is 100% correct. I'm posting this as this doesn't seem right and that if pet potency for the Rook/Bishop autoturret says "Potency: blah" like the owners does it should be equated in the same manner. If it's calculated differently the tooltip should say something like "Pet Potency: blah".

Post your results please. Not just say that it is 20%. I'm just curious.

[Erai]

When You are turning potency to Damage, Pets are not using the same filter, I mean:

Turrent : X potency
MCH: Y Potency

X==Y does not mean Damage(X)==Damage (Y).

SMN has a trait like MCH, +30% damage actions and pet, and it happens the same, 100 potency from pet is not turned to the same amount of damage than 100 potency SMN spell damage.

Except this just brings up something that was never brought up before. It does NOT happen to be the same as MCH. SMN pets deal EXACTLY 30% less than us when comparing potency to damage. A garuda auto does 100 potency, and it's damage output is EXACTLY 30% less than a 1 fester dot. Our trait is 30%. I just went to test this out.

Just coincidence that MCH has a 20% trait and their pet does 20% less, and SMN has a 30% trait and their pet does 30% less? Doubt it.

Exactly. 300 potency heal from Eos =/= 300 potency heal from me.

See above, I bet if you checked, Eos heals exactly 30% (aka the missing trait) than you when comparing similar potencies.

Regardless of how a SMN's pet has dealt damage. The fact that the damage difference is exactly 20% which is what the trait is, is why I bring this up. I'm not saying that this is 100% correct. I'm posting this as this doesn't seem right and that if pet potency for the Rook/Bishop autoturret says "Potency: blah" like the owners does it should be equated in the same manner. If it's calculated differently the tooltip should say something like "Pet Potency: blah".

I believe this is something that you may have just found with MCH that went unnoticed since launch with SMN, as I stated above. Could be a flaw in pet traits in general. People just said pets deal less damage, etc etc while we had SMN, but nobody actually bothered to see it was the exact 30% that is missing from the trait. Definitely looking to see more info on this from developers.

Edit to add: Can't exclude Eos and SCH. Suffering the same effect.

[Erai]

Pending how this goes the next few days, I may level up a summoner again and see how the traits work once earned, since as of now it seems they are suffering the same effect as MCH with the trait not being counted. However, SMN is actually testable as each trait is earned. If with each trait that increases player+pet damage, only player damage increases, bug will be confirmed for SMN+SCH+MCH.

[Garrulf]

Tested as:

LV60 MCH
No Party
No Companions
LV50 Striking Dummy

Should we test more?

Here is the album for screenshots as proof
Album Link