240 likes and not a single response from SE.
240 likes and not a single response from SE.
And what if the answer was no? They have to keep in mind all of the players, not just the ones making noise. Quite a few of us out there have zero issue with the GC restriction, it's actually a positive from my perspective. I have pride in the Immortal Flames, often times me and my FC mates queue at the same time and look for each other on the battlefield. We have quite a bit of fun with it, but bear in mind just because some people agree with you it does not mean we all do.
Just your friendly neighborhood elezen
That's just making the best of a bad situation. Sure you might not mind the 1-2 hour long queues but some of us do.And what if the answer was no? They have to keep in mind all of the players, not just the ones making noise. Quite a few of us out there have zero issue with the GC restriction, it's actually a positive from my perspective. I have pride in the Immortal Flames, often times me and my FC mates queue at the same time and look for each other on the battlefield. We have quite a bit of fun with it, but bear in mind just because some people agree with you it does not mean we all do.
Then it would be no? It would be nice to see a response. Either way theres no reason to have GC locked PvP. I regret picking the immortal lames. They just thirsty to storm off for kills and not doing objectives. If they wont take off the GC restrictions then let us keep our ranks when we switch GCs.And what if the answer was no? They have to keep in mind all of the players, not just the ones making noise. Quite a few of us out there have zero issue with the GC restriction, it's actually a positive from my perspective. I have pride in the Immortal Flames, often times me and my FC mates queue at the same time and look for each other on the battlefield. We have quite a bit of fun with it, but bear in mind just because some people agree with you it does not mean we all do.
You're literally the only person I've ever heard of that likes the restriction. Sure it's cool to feel like you're part of a team. It's not worth having to literally wait an hour or more for each match though.And what if the answer was no? They have to keep in mind all of the players, not just the ones making noise. Quite a few of us out there have zero issue with the GC restriction, it's actually a positive from my perspective. I have pride in the Immortal Flames, often times me and my FC mates queue at the same time and look for each other on the battlefield. We have quite a bit of fun with it, but bear in mind just because some people agree with you it does not mean we all do.
Well now you've met two. I don't WANT to do PvP with the Adders or the Flames. Doing so loses the feel of PvP completely. There is no sense of pride or accomplishment without some form of faction. It's what creates competition.
A compromise would be releasing GC numbers, so we know what GCs have the least members, and then allowing people to be traitors by being able to choose what GC to queue as. Just don't force me to be a traitor. It ruins PvP for me.
PS. I've never had to wait that long for PvP. 30 mins at most for me.
I wait 191 minutes today before calling it quits. I can't even queue with my closest friend because queues are even longer not solo. Don't tell me to check english, or to join in progress, etc. I've tried all that. It's complete and utter ass. Just because you're not getting long wait times doesn't mean you get to continue your role playing. PLUS a lot of suggestions, which I completely agree with, simply suggest the option to queue as a mercenary. So continue playing with your flames or whatever. Let the rest of us queue up, solo or as a group, as mercenaries if we would like.A compromise would be releasing GC numbers, so we know what GCs have the least members, and then allowing people to be traitors by being able to choose what GC to queue as. Just don't force me to be a traitor. It ruins PvP for me.
PS. I've never had to wait that long for PvP. 30 mins at most for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.