Hair texture quality, among other texture qualities.

[Naraku_Diabolos]

This has been bugging me since 2.0 released. Would it be hard for the developmental team to increase the quality in the looks of how the hair texture is? Mind you, hair looks like it has horizontal and vertical lines going through the strands. It really does not look good to me, though others would beg to differ. Is there any chance now that since we have DirectX 11, that there could be an option to remove those pesky horizontal/vertical lines from the strands of hair so that it looks very neat?



Another thing is that a lot of armor still has some form of pixilation in finer detail. Is there any way that it could be fixed so it looks cleaner on DirectX 11? It may have the developmental team to look back at older gear, but it's just a few things on certain gear that really shows pixilation.

[dekal]

I think the problem is that the game is on the ps3/4 platform and those systems can't take it. Blame those players . jk...but slry is cuz of the ps3/4.

[Daralii]

I think the problem is that the game is on the ps3/4 platform and those systems can't take it. Blame those players . jk...but slry is cuz of the ps3/4.

Yup. If the PS3 is ever left behind I imagine there'll be a decent increase in visual quality, but until then we're kind of stuck.

The dream is that, eventually, max settings will be back to 1.0 quality.

[basketofseals]

Yup. If the PS3 is ever left behind I imagine there'll be a decent increase in visual quality, but until then we're kind of stuck.

The dream is that, eventually, max settings will be back to 1.0 quality.

People like to drum up the 1.0 quality, but it was honestly in a lot of really unnecessary and unnoticeable places. There was the particularly notable instance of potted plants having more polygons than player characters.

[WinterLuna]

That specific hairstyle also looks really weird when it moves in the wind etc, and if you tilt the camera a certain way, it looks awful. But yeah, this really is down to the fact the PS3 can't handle it.

I think the problem is that the game is on the ps3/4 platform and those systems can't take it. Blame those players . jk...but slry is cuz of the ps3/4.

PS3, yes. PS4 can handle a lot graphically. Not as much as PC's of course, but they definitely can handle more than people assume.

[Fevelle]

Some hair textures are better... The lalafell-only hairstyles have good textures I think. Why that diffrence?

[Atlaworks]

Some hair textures are better... The lalafell-only hairstyles have good textures I think. Why that diffrence?

Because only a lalafell's hair is high up enough from the ground to be in your field of vision.

[Lanceton]

to me, ridding of these 'unnecessary' stuff made the game feels like wow-level graphics, taking the plants you mentioned about for example, they're now just 'cards' stacked together
FF's always about graphic fidelity, and 2.0 got a downgrade on that.
the only graphic 'flaw' I could remember in 1.0 was the 2 tiered texture for distant terrain.. it switched instantly to lower rez texture at like I dunno 1000 yard or so distance
if they made that switch a blend-in transition it'd be flawless

[basketofseals]

to me, ridding of these 'unnecessary' stuff made the game feels like wow-level graphics, taking the plants you mentioned about for example, they're now just 'cards' stacked together
FF's always about graphic fidelity, and 2.0 got a downgrade on that.
the only graphic 'flaw' I could remember in 1.0 was the 2 tiered texture for distant terrain.. it switched instantly to lower rez texture at like I dunno 1000 yard or so distance
if they made that switch a blend-in transition it'd be flawless

It's "unnecessary" because those resources that were spent fine-detailing those plants could have been better spent elsewhere. Most notably it was needed in map details because 1.0 maps were about 12 set pieces per country that were simply copy pasted ad nauseum. Rather than fancy plants, I'd rather see more clothes/armor/hair.

[Gramul]

People like to drum up the 1.0 quality, but it was honestly in a lot of really unnecessary and unnoticeable places. There was the particularly notable instance of potted plants having more polygons than player characters.

Is that level of detail not something to strive for? Especially in our own characters?
And it's not like they'd have to remove the lower quality assets. That should still be available for lower end computers.