Duty Roulette Dungeon Grouping

[Frost_Trunks]

Ok, so I looked through the first three pages and I didn't see a similar posts. If I missed it, sorry.

Why did they group the roulette dungeons the way they did? Since when is a dungeon, in which you can run it at max level, considered "Low Level"? Does anyone else feel these need to be grouped better?

The fact that there are only two dungeons in expert is lame. I would say throw the previous expert dungeons in the mix (level sync'd), but then I will just queue Keeper of the Lake, every... single... time...

[PotatoWafflez]

Low level roulette is spilt into 15-47 for ARR and 51-59 for HS because it is primarily used to level as far as I know you can't run anything max level in the low roulette.

Expert will get more dungeons in 3.1 when they add the three new dungeons that we usually get every patch.

In terms of throwing level 50 dungeons into the expert roulette I think that would be unfair due to the difficulty difference and the fact any gear that drops would be 100% irrelevant the point of expert is to gear up quickly having dungeons that drop 0 upgrades is not useful, you can get ilvl160 from the two dungeons in expert which helps you while you get your tomes, this is another reason as to why every patch dungeons get moved out of expert when new ones come in because the gear that drops is better than the previous set not to mention people would stop running the expert roulette after the bonus for the day if they had the chance of getting a dungeon that will drop 0 law tomes if run with no bonus.

And whenever I run Hard roulette I always get HMHM so go figure.

[Frost_Trunks]

And whenever I run Hard roulette I always get HMHM so go figure.

I'd take HMHM over KotL.

[Frost_Trunks]

lol... so apparently, they agreed with me. How to solve the problem? Rename the roulettes. Fair enough.