Suggestion: Dark Knight Revamp (Yes I know another one)

[Zarzak]

Riposte
Guarantees a parry on the next 2 incoming attacks. The second parry is at 50% of the parry strength of the first. Each parry immediately triggers a 100? potency counter attack.
//Vanquish Effect: Restores MP equivalent to the amount of damage each counter did.
//Grit Effect: Restores TP equivalent to the amount of damage each counter did.
30? Second Cooldown.

Not gonna comment on the post as a whole plenty have.. But this is OP as all hell.

If things hit for 100 sure. but your talking about a skill that WOULD fill your TP or mana to full every 30 seconds. Ignoring the fact that the mana portion would be largely worthless due to needing to parry while in a dps stance.

[Ditto]

Not gonna comment on the post as a whole plenty have.. But this is OP as all hell.

If things hit for 100 sure. but your talking about a skill that WOULD fill your TP or mana to full every 30 seconds. Ignoring the fact that the mana portion would be largely worthless due to needing to parry while in a dps stance.

You might want to at least read the whole post then. Or at least just what is in bold. (It's bold for a reason)

Also, there is plenty of reason to tank outside of a tanking stance.

[Zarzak]

You might want to at least read the whole post then. Or at least just what is in bold. (It's bold for a reason)

Also, there is plenty of reason to tank outside of a tanking stance.

I did read the whole post. It says numbers are placeholders. I'm giving feedback that they need to be drastically reduced in the TP department and giving feedback that a ripo ability in an offensive stance is misplaced. Assuming the whole offensive stance idea went ahead make it a 2 hit offensive attack that restores MP similar to sipon. Makes far more sense.

[Ditto]

I did read the whole post. It says numbers are placeholders. I'm giving feedback that they need to be drastically reduced in the TP department and giving feedback that a ripo ability in an offensive stance is misplaced. Assuming the whole offensive stance idea went ahead make it a 2 hit offensive attack that restores MP similar to sipon. Makes far more sense.

I could see the TP becoming a problem if it's implemented like that, sure, and it'd probably really also lead to having some really unusual amounts of TP. A flat rate would probably be better. Yet at the same time though, I'm questioning if it'd be a good idea in general to have to rely on one of our on demand tank buster mitigation abilities to restore TP. It may be better suited somewhere else entirely.

And I'd be fine with that offensive version as well, I'd like it a lot better.

[Zarzak]

I could see the TP becoming a problem if it's implemented like that, sure, and it'd probably really also lead to having some really unusual amounts of TP. A flat rate would probably be better. Yet at the same time though, I'm questioning if it'd be a good idea in general to have to rely on one of our on demand tank buster mitigation abilities to restore TP. It may be better suited somewhere else entirely.

Eh... Assuming the fight has a tank buster it would likely be used enough to keep TP steady if it restored a couple hundred.

to be equal to invig it would restore 100 (400 every 120 so 100 every 30) but you could easily argue bumping it to 200/250 because DRK already have to handle MP as a resource so making TP a "easily managed resource" wouldn't remove resource management from the class.

Even if you had to hold onto it for a 50 sec reuse tank buster or something similar would be plenty to keep you running.