Airship Guide

[Arcticharm]

For 99% of my posts, I write up the post, ctrl-a, ctrl-x, then actually post "asdfasdfasdf" <_< then edit, ctrl-a, ctrl-p, save. I'm just waiting for the day someone catches me in the middle of that and replies to my "asdfasdfasdf" post xD Sometimes, I post "placeholder" instead, which is just long enough to count, and less embarrassing if someone actually sees it.

Ah! The secrets to the long posts comes out! Now that I know this I’ll be able to condense my posts. I was starting to get frustrated with the 1000 character limit as well.

I agree, although I had put this idea to rest in my own mind, the better thing to do would be to rule it out with data. Although my company tends to repair our airship after every flight, I have a lot more control over my alt airship. I'll let the parts get as bad as they can get and I'll report to you my observations \o/

This will definitely help get us more info on condition affecting what we can or cannot gather due to that statement.

I was thinking something simple like record the % before sending out, record condition upon return and note what winds the ship saw. If I do this twice and get different % drops with different winds OR get the same % drop with different winds then I think we’ll have the answer to whether the wind affects condition drop? (Basically, if I get a linear drop with different wind conditions, it’s likely just the act of sending it out vs different drops from different winds)

I'm not sure if you saw before but I requested a column to enter the airship name. It would be helpful for me for keeping track of which ones are mine and it might also help us in analysis if we wish to narrow something down to just one airship's progress.

It's been fun to see what people are naming their ships; it might be fun to add this link to your front guide for people to reference. There's some science fiction ones on there too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_prefix

Line 11's trip to Sector 02 is also potentially off (I think it should be Satisfactory, rather than Decent), but I don't think you entered that one.

I had entered it. It's fixed now; some problems with translation but it should be correct now