Getting refused to EX groups as a DRK

[Kaedan]

Why would WAR be a worse MT than DRK? WAR has better damage, better mitigation, and offers better party support than DRK while main tanking.

Why would PLD be a worse OT than DRK? PLD has similar damage output to DRK, exceeding it after about 2 minutes of fighting, and offers far better party support than DRK while off tanking.

I'm having an incredibly hard time trying to figure out what your reasoning is for either of these claims, because DRK offers absolutely nothing of value that these tanks aren't capable of doing better.

-WAR does not have better mitigation than a DRK. Also, DRK and WAR are fairly equal in damage as MT. So: DRK has better mitigation and equal damage, so DRK is the better MT.
-DRK's damage as an OT is much higher than a PLDs, not "similar". True that DRKs have some TP issues, but that's after 3 minutes, not 2.

Curious what support you think WARs and PLDs offer better than DRKs too?

[Xariann]

-WAR does not have better mitigation than a DRK.

I did some calculations some time ago, I found that WAR does indeed have better mitigation and it's also slightly better than DRK for magic damage reduction. But those calculations were purely based on theoretical tank busters (and yes I did make up a scenario with an hypothetical magic tank buster), so that doesn't take into account sustained damage instead of burst, or add tanking.