any questions?

[User201109011315]

You make a good point about asking questions that address your concern. The problem i am trying to point out is that there are many assumptions that are driving your concern. Of course it is okay to make predictions based on the information given. But it is not okay to ask questions as if those assumptions are fact.

For example, instead of asking



which makes the assumption that the Bard/Archer is a fact, ask



Also, the idea of "hard-hitting journalism" has a negative (yet ambitious) connotation for ignoring the truth in favor of scandal. You might want to choose a different term, or a different approach.

How about I just say what I mean, assumptions and all? If they want to create an environment where facile conclusions are no longer drawn from minimal information, then they should get to work on that, but until then, such is life. I mean, no offence, but this is what happens. And in case you failed to notice, the whole point of my asking such questions is an attempt to allay confusion, spawned from assumptions and doubt. To mask the confusion and assumptions behind neutral language is disingenuous/ fake.

If you take exception to my presumptuous nature and pointed questions, then let that be a lesson to you. This is what happens where there is, like, zero information on the motivations and intentions of the development team.