So, why isn't this a thing yet?

[Samcaesar]

Snip

That's not my "opinion", child pornography ("Virtual" or otherwise) isn't a good thing that's a fact, it's objectively morally wrong. Removing/Preventing things that are objectively morally wrong isn't a bad thing, in fact it should be welcome.

Have you even looked at some of the filth that TERA or the anime industry produces? It's not that I "don't like it", hell I don't like tanks in bikinis, but I can at least recognize that they're sexualizing an adults body, which is much less problematic than sexualizing a child's body.

Whenever there's a thread wanting child characters, with someone claiming that "Raya-O-Senna is hotter than Minfilia", then people trying to make it seem like "virtual child pornography" is different than "actual child pornography", I wouldn't really say I'm trying "to desperately defend from inexistant enemies". I don't get how not wanting pedophiles in a game to feel welcome is childish.

Yes.. Drawings and pixels deliberately made to be sexually attractive to pedophiles.

Snip

Great ad hominem! Carrying on.

No. I've said I don't like it because I've seen what being "tolerant" of this sort of stuff results in in the anime industry. Frankly it'll only getting worse and worse, look at what it's done to TERA, look at what it's done to anime and those disgusting people who want "loli/shota"

And oh hey let's have a fun quote from one of the most influential men in animation history --

"It's difficult. [My female protagonists] immediately become the subjects of rorikon gokko (play toy for Lolita Complex males). In a sense, if we want to depict someone who is affirmative to us, we have no choice but to make them as lovely as possible. But now, there are too many people who shamelessly depict [such protagonists] as if they just want [such girls] as pets, and things are escalating more and more."

—Hayao Miyazaki, 1988 interview with Animage

Cristo, you folks sound like the same folks who say "You're being the REAL racist by calling out my racist behavior!". Is it wrong that I'm bothered by the fact people love to sexualize children? No, because most people are bothered by the fact that people want to sexualize children. I've stated my reason for being so adamant about this, but instead you make baseless attacks. A "Lolicon" is someone who's a pedophile, it comes from the book "Lolita" about a man who has a sexual attraction to a twelve year old girl. You can't call yourself a fan of "Loli/shota" and not be a pedophile, it's literally where the phrase comes from.

Snip

Fun, more ad hominem!

It's not just in mainstream anime, it's in the entire industry. The people at fault at those "otakus" who crave little girls, you know lolicons.

No, pedophilia is an attraction to children. No matter what way you spin this "loli/shota" is children. Are men who look at drawn versions of two men having sex and masturbate to it gay? Yes. Yes they are. There isn't a different category for being attracted to "virtual" versions of something. If you are sexually attracted to "virtual men" and you are a man, you are attracted to men.

Snip

Got an issue with people corrupting things? Blame the OP, you know, the person who finds Raya-O-Senna, a person with the physical appearance of a child, hot. Don't blame people who are being rightfully cautious. Either way, yeah, I'd love for this thread to be deleted.