So, why isn't this a thing yet?

[Samcaesar]

Snip

The issue is it would . You even admit yourself that you're gonna see someone prancing around in the taffeta as a "child" race. They won't get to TERA levels of bad, but you can be sure that people will try. Slap on the Immortal Flames' Loincloth (Huzzah for Raubahns weird tastes in micro-mini?) and the bikini top, and that's a pretty revealing outfit.

So what is SE to do of the short skirts already in game? Or the bikini bottoms, or the loincloth, or the fishnet stockings, or the thravanian (Spell check?) set, or the leather harness/subligars, or the awkward and unneeded belly window on the DRG AF, or the weird boob window in the NIN AF? Sure most gear is practical, but that doesn't stop those who want to wear sexualized outfits from just glamouring on the bikini tops to tank DPS, or heal in them, and there's no way to stop that outside of limiting glamour for "Children" PCs further, which I can assure you will result in either no one touching them or thread upon thread begging SE to allow them to have the loincloth and whatever.

Fine, child options wouldn't be that bad, the issue is finessing all of it around to pedophiles don't feel like they now have a safe place in FFXIV to express their sexuality as they do in TERA. I've gotta ask though, what's the issue with just playing as the girl Au Ra? Their max heights are 5'3 and their lowest is 4'8, that's plenty short enough for you to play as a girl at like age 15, heck their faces even suggest much younger looks. As much as I detest the younger nadeshiko look of the Au Ra, I've got to ask how is that too old looking for you, because I certainly can't see them as even close to 18, MAYBE 16, but I could see them as younger.

Sure, if completely health adults, pedophilia isn't something that will occur and chances are they'll see it as disgusting. But what can be "encouraged" is making Pedophiles feel like FFXIV is a safe place to express their sexuality, thus increasing the amount pedophiles. It's "encouraging" in the sense that allowing it means it'll make it easier for a pedophile to have fun with ERP or whatever. The brain is influenced by two factors, biology and sociology, I can tell you, in a society that has the age of consent at 13, sexualizing younger people becomes very easy, but the long term psychological affects of an adult engaging with a child at younger ages is generally universal. It's why age of consent is constantly up for debate and is different from places to places. By the way, it's been suggested that police within Japan purposely fudge numbers to keep up the whole "Japan is so properly functioning! Look low crime rates!" deal, specifically with stuff like writing off homicides as suicide cases.

Yeah, an insanely negative social stigma (That changes from country to country mind you) to something that people should have a very negative social stigma attached to. The issue is you're creating a safe environment for them to express themselves, I mean, what's SE gonna do when MrCreepypants invites that Lalaqo'te into his private chambers for some fun? Turns out they realize they're not alone with their sexuality and they begin to form small communities that grow larger and larger. It's how being alienated for some specific feature works, and sometimes it's not a bad thing! Shoot, look at safe spaces such as FCs for legitimate sexualities like being gay or bisexual, that's fine because there isn't anything inherently wrong with being gay or bisexual. But it can also work in reverse. SE knows it can't stop stuff like ERP on Balmung, so they generally live it alone unless if it's in public and someone reports it to a GM. So, what will SE do about those pedophile communities that will grow larger and larger, especially whenever the object of their sexuality is handed to them on a silver platter? I think you're applying way to many defining factors to make someone a "pedophile", point is they are sexually attracted to children, it doesn't matter why it happens, for all intents and purposes of the argument, it just happens. And uh, I'd like to see your sources on that, considering there's plenty of arguments to suggest access to stuff like non-con pornographic material helps increase the want to commit the act.

That's an issue though, you can't just write off pedophiles as some minority, especially within gamer/anime communities. Look at what Lolicons have done to the anime industry, they've warped it into a really disgusting thing where a lot of studios are making content advertised and made for them. Look at what they've done to TERA. Heck, look at what creeps did to "My Little Pony" for an example in the western world. It's a legitimate fear to be concerned of it happening with FFXIV, and until you can (Well SE primarily) can think of a solution to that sort of issue, I'm going to stay fairly firm in my position in not supporting it and hope others stay firm in not supporting it as well.

Snip

Uh, I'd like to see your source on that claim, last time I checked we've got a child Miqo'te in your first post, and an obviously older option that is the current option for players, so they apparently age. We haven't seen any older girl Miqo'te yet, sure, but it's not like they don't exist (Heck, iirc the leader of the U tribe definitely looks physically older than other male Miqo'te, though he is a male), they age like any other race in Hydaelyn sans Padjal and they're blessed by the elements.

You said "Raya-O-Senna" is hotter than Minfilia. Raya is an entirely young girl, while not everyone who picks Padjal as an option would be a pedo, it sounds like those who pick it because "Padjal are hot" are exhibiting some pedophilic tendencies.. Because they're literally children for life. Finding children (Even if they happen to be children for a long time) attractive is pedophilia.

Excuse me for pointing out finding children attractive is wrong?

Snip

Yes I do, men wearing dresses doesn't have anything wrong with it, just like a full grown man wearing stockings isn't wrong. They're an adult, wearing straps of cloth, there isn't anything objectively wrong with it. What your doing is a thing called "False equivalences" Crossdressing != Young children wearing clothes meant for sex appeal, especially whenever it's a child that literally lacks a will of it's own. Implementing PC children means you know there will be a group of people wearing clothes designed for sex appeal like the fishnet stockings or the bikinis as children (Or in this scenario, adults making young children avatars wearing sexy clothes), thus sexualizing children. You could say "Well just edit them to make them less sexual!!" but people will complain to SE to the point were it's allowed.

"Crossdressing" harms absolutely no one. Allowing the sexualization of children affirms pedophiles in their sexuality, which is very harmful. You're starting to sound like those kinds of people who say "If we start allowing gay marriage we'll get people marrying animals and children!!"

Personally, I would prefer this game to steer away from the (potentially playable) obnoxiously cute races for a few years. That Miqo'te child just looks incredibly unnatural compared to the Hyur and Elezen children... hell, even to adult Miqo'te (do Miqo'te ears AND eyes start off massive before their skull 'grows into them'?). Way too anime for my liking.

Though if people still want a cute playable race, then why not the Vanu Vanu? Those are adorable.

Oh man the Vanu Vanu are lovable fluffy bastard. I for one thing the Vath/Gnath are super cute, I love how cute they are with their obsession over food or how they all still use "We" and are still individuals. Or heck the Kobolds! They're cowardly and meek to an adorable fault. Or the Sylphs! They're mischievous and adorable floating cabbages! The only issue with them is the whole "floating" bit.

Still rooting and praying for a mature face option + better height range for the girl Au Ra still, Nestama. Prayin to the Twelve that it's added in 3.1