MSQ req for DK ?????

[Kiara1]

3 i like the story BUT i could do the story and UNLOCK the new expansion zones even if they would allow us to play DK ( the difference ? i would enjoy the game WAAY more )

I agree with you. But unfortunately people on these forums don't agree with anyone who tries to break the lore.

[MilesSaintboroguh]

Because Dark Knight.

Just like in EQ, Shadow Knights are called SKs instead of the ingame abbreviation on gear: SHD.

Or in both games where Paladins are called Pallies, not PAL/PLD.

Except DRK is the more official way to use Dark Knight due to how the game uses 3 letter shorthand for all classes.

[Shiro-Koizumi]

Is it really a such a pain to throw in that third letter? Lazy people I swear.

[Phafi]

it's going to be funny in two weeks when we see a thread from him about how DRK is garbage and they ruined his immersion.

[MilesSaintboroguh]

it's going to be funny in two weeks when we see a thread from him about how DRK is garbage and they ruined his immersion.

You're too late on that. The minute DRK was revealed, people already complained about how the class was tank instead of DPS and how it had no HP sacrificing abilities.

[Eidolon]

I agree with you. But unfortunately people on these forums don't agree with anyone who tries to break the lore.

I seriously hate this arguement because it's the most irrelevant arguement out there.

"Anyone who tries to break the lore" the way the classes were written were to have the trainer gated inside of Ishgard. There is nothing that could've stopped SE from putting the trainer in Eorzea for level 30-50, then having the trainer re-locate to Ishgard post-50. There are -any number- of reasons they could've come out to Erozea. Any number of reasons they could be anywhere. It is up to the writers 110% to do so, and simply put, they chose the laziest/easiest way of gating them inside the content.

I'll accept certain arguements, but this one I disagree adamantly with.